اثر تنش خشکی و روش کشت نشایی بر صفات زراعی، عملکرد کمی و کیفی و راندمان مصرف آب ارقام مختلف چغندرقند در کشت پاییزه

نوع مقاله : کامل علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد جیرفت، جیرفت، ایران.

2 دانشیار مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی جنوب استان کرمان، کرمان، ایران.

3 استادیار دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد جیرفت، جیرفت، ایران.

4 دانشیار مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

چکیده

دو آزمایش جداگانه طی سال‌های 96-95 و 97-96 به­صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مرکز تحقیقات شهید مقبلی شهرستان جیرفت انجام شد. در آزمایش اول ابتدا اثرات روش کاشت شامل کاشت مستقیم و نشائی بر رقم­های مختلف چغندرقند شامل پالما، شریف و مراک مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و سپس در آزمایش دوم از بین ارقام مورد بررسی آزمایش اول، رقم با عملکرد بالا (مراک) انتخاب شد. همچنین اثرات زمان آبیاری (که بر اساس 50، 70 و 90 درصد نیاز آبی صورت گرفت) و روش­های کاشت (مستقیم و نشایی) بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی آن مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. در آزمایش اول بالاترین میزان ماده خشک ریشه، درصد قند قابل استحصال، درصد قند، وزن ریشه، طول ریشه، وزن تر اندام هوایی، عملکرد ریشه و قند از رقم مراک و روش کاشت نشائی به‌دست آمد. نتایج آزمایش دوم نشان داد زمان آبیاری بر اساس 70 درصد نیاز آبی منجر به دستیابی به عملکرد ریشه و قند بیشتر همراه با بهبود چشمگیر کارایی مصرف آب گردید. همچنین از آنجایی که کاشت نشایی موجب بهبود عملکرد ریشه و قند شد، بنابراین کاشت نشایی همراه با آبیاری در زمان 70 درصد نیاز آبی جهت دستیابی به عملکرد مطلوب ریشه و شکر توصیه می­گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of drought stress and transplanting method on agronomic characteristics, quantitative and qualitative yield as well as water use efficiency of different sugar beet cultivars in autumn planting

نویسندگان [English]

  • H. Saeidabadi 1
  • Gh.R. Afsharmanesh 2
  • M.H. Shirzadi 3
  • S. Sadeghzadeh Hemayati 4
1 PhD student of Department of Agronomy, Jiroft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jiroft, Iran.
2 Associate professor of Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center in the south of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
3 Assistant professor of Department of Agronomy, Jiroft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jiroft, Iran.
4 Associate Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj,Iran
چکیده [English]

Two separate trials were conducted as a factorial design based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Shahid Moghbeli Agricultural Research Center in Jiroft, Iran in two cropping seasons (2016-17 and 2017-18). In the first trial, the effects of planting method including direct planting and transplanting on different sugar beet cultivars including Palma, Sharif, and Merak were evaluated, and then in the second trial, among studied cultivars, a high yield cultivar (Merak) was selected. Also, the effect of irrigation time (based on 50, 70, and 90% of water requirement) and planting methods on its quantitative and qualitative yield were evaluated. In the first trial, the highest root dry matter, extraction coefficient of sugar, sugar content, root weight, root length, fresh leaf weight, root yield and sugar yield were obtained for Merak cultivar and transplanting. The result of the second trial showed that the irrigation time based on 70% of water requirement led to the highest root and sugar yield along with a significant improvement in water use efficiency. In addition, as transplanting improved root yield and sugar yield, therefore, transplanting method with irrigation at the time of 70% of water requirement is recommended to obtain optimal root yield and sugar yield.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Extraction coefficient of sugar
  • Sugar beet
  • Sugar yield
  • Water Use Efficiency
Abedi T, Pakniyat H. Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress in ten cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breed. 2012; 46: 27-34.
Adibifard N, Habibi D, Bazrafshan M, Taleghani D, Ilkaee MN. Study of the climatic condition of Fars province for the development of autumn-sown sugar beet planting using Geographic Information System (GIS). Journal of Sugar Beet. 2019; 35(1): 13- 35. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007; 59: 206-216.
Ayas S, Korukcu A. Water-yield relationships in deficit irrigated potato. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University. 2010; 24(2): 23-26.
Boureima S, Diouf M, Amoukou AI, Van DP. Screening for sources of tolerance to drought in sesame induced mutants: Assessment of indirect selection criteria for seed yield. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience. 2016; 4(1): 45-60.
David Tarkalson D, Imad E, Werner B, Bradley A. Drought tolerance selection of sugar beet hybrids. Journal of Sugar Beet Research. 2014; 51: 1-2.
Draycott AP. Sugar beet. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. 2008.
EL Sabagh A, Sorour S, Omar AE, Islam MS, Ueda A, Saneoka H, Barutçular C. Soybean (Glycine Max L.) growth enhancement under water stress conditions. Int. Conference on Chemical, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (CABS). 2015; Sept. 4-5. Istanbul (Turkey).
EL Sabagh A, Hossain A, Barutçular C, Islam MS, Ratnasekera D, Kumar N, Meena RS, Gharib HS, Saneoka H, Teixeira da Silva JA. Drought and salinity stress management for higher and sustainable canola (Brassica napus L.) production: a critical review. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2019; 13(01):88-97.
Eskandari A, Khazaie HR, Nezami A, Kafi M. Study the effects of irrigation regimes on yield and some qualitative characteristics of three cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Water and Soil. 2011; 25(2): 240-247.
Gohari J, Yousefabadi V, Kazeminikhah, Norouzi K, Baghaei kia M. Research report of the effect of seedling transfer time on quantity and quality of yield in potted sugar beet cultivation in saline lands. Sugar Beet Institute. 2012. (in Persian)
Gohary J, Roohi A, Sabzeie Q. Effect of transplanting in quality and yield of Sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 1993; 9, 22-32. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Haghighat A, Sattar M, Raisi F. The effect of irrigation regimes and different amounts of nitrogen on the yield and grade of sugar beet. Seventh National Seminar on Irrigation and Evaporation Reduction. March 1-2. Kerman. 2000; 109 -112. (in Persian)
Heidari M, Rezapor A. Effects of water stress on yield and sulfur, chlorophyll and nutrient concentrations in Nigella sativa. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2011; 1(1): 81-90. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Karagoz H, Cakmakci R, Hosseinpour A, Kodaz S. Alleviation of water stress and promotion of the growth of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants by multi-traits rhizobacteria. Applied Ecological, Environmental Research. 2018; 16(5): 6801-6813.
Karbalaei S, Mehraban A, Mobasser HR, Bitarafan Z. Sowing date and transplant root size effects on transplanted sugar beet in spring planting. Annals of Biological Research, 2012; 3(7): 3474-3478.
Mandal K, Saravanan R, and Maiti S. Effect of different levels of N, P and K on downy mildew (Peronospora plantaginis) and seed yield of Plantago ovata. 2008; Crop Pro. 27(6): 988-995.
Mirzaei M. R. and Ghadami Firoozabadi A. Investigation of quantity and quality of sugar beet in two leaky and micro irrigation systems. Final report 85/892 of the Sugar Beet Research Institute. 2007. (in Persian)
Monti A., Amaducci M.T., Pritoni G., and Verturi G. Variation in carbon isotope discrimination during growth and at different organs in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L). Field Crops Research. 2006; 98: 157-163.
Munns R, and James R. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: A case study with tetraploid wheat. 2003; Plant & Soil, 253, 201-218.
Nasri R, Kashani A, Sadeghian Motahar Y, Habibi D. Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of fall sugar beet in direct cultivation and paper pot transplanting under saline soils of Ahvaz. Agronomy and Plant Breeding Journal. 2011; 7(7): 25-40.
Nasri R, Kashani AS, Paknejad F, Sadeghiand M, Ghorbani S. Correlation and path analysis of yield and quality of sugar beet in both direct seeding and transplanting of saline lands. Agricultural and Horticulture. 2012; 8(1): 226-313.
Nyakan M, Ghorbanly M. Effects of drought stress on growth, photosynthetic parameters, protein and ionic content of the air and ground soya cultivars. Journal of Rostaniha. 2007; 8(1): 17-32. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Ober ES, Rajabi A. Abiotic stress in sugar beet. Sugar Tech. 2010; 12: 294-298.
Romano A, Sorgona A, Lupini A, Araniti F, Stevanato P, Cacco G, Abenavoli MR. Morpho-physiological responses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes to drought stress. – Acta Physiology Plantarum. 2013; 35: 853–865.
Sadrabadi Haghighi R, Amirmoradi S, Mirshahi A. Investigation of growth analysis of conventional and commercial sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties at delayed planting date in Chenaran (Khorasan Razavi province). Iranian. Journal of Field Crop. Research. 2011; 9(3): 505-513. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Slama I, Ghnaya T, Hessini K, Messedi D, Savoure A, Abdelly C. Comparative study of the effects of mannitol and PEG osmotic stress on growth and solute accumulation in Sesuviumportulacastrum. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007; 61: 10–17.
Shabala S, Cuin TA. Potassium transport and plant salt tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum, 2008; 133: 651-669.
Tardieu F, Reymond M, Hamard P, Granier C, Muller B. Spatial distributions of expansion rate, cell division rate and cell size in maize leaves: a synthesis of the effects of soil water status, evaporative demand and temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2000; 51: 1505-1514.
Tarkalson DD, King BA. Effects of tillage and irrigation management on sugar beet production. Agronomy Journal. 2017; 109: 1–11.
Terasawa H, Osaki M. Effects on growth and yield of raising sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) seedlings in pots made of chemically modified paper produced by cross linking wood polysaccharide by using dimethylol dihydroxyl ethylene urea. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2009; 80(6): 561-565.
Ucan K, Gencoglan C. The effect of water deficit on yield and yield components of sugar beet. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2006; 28: 163-172.
Wedeking R, Mahlein AK, Steiner U, Oerke EC, Goldbach H, Wimmer MA. Osmotic adjustment of young sugar beets (Beta vulgaris) under progressive drought stress and subsequent rewatering assessed by metabolite analysis and infrared thermography. Functional Plant Biology. 2017; 44: 119–133.
Wensen W, Cheng W, Dayu P, Yakun Z, Bin L, Jianwei J. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence images of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2018; 11(2): 196-201.
Wu G, Wang C, Su Y. Assessment of drought tolerance in seedlings of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars using inorganic and organic solutes accumulation criteria. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2014; 60, 565–576.
Yousef abadi VA, Hariri Moghadam F, Khairkhah M, Rabani M, Keshavarz K, MostashariM, Froghimanesh F. Seedling cultivation after grain cutting water. Thirty Sixth Seminar Iranian Lumb Sugar and Sugar Factory. Karaj. 2015. (in Persian).
 Zhang C, Shibata Y, Kishimoto T. Effect of tillage and planting method on yield of sugar beet production. In: Proceedings. International of Agricultural Engineering Conference, 3-6 Dec., 2007; Bangkok. Thailand.