Sugar beet hybrids response to rhizomania disease in the infected fields

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj,Iran

2 Mashhad

3 Shiraz

4 Oromieh

5 Sabt

Abstract

Rhizomania is one of the most important diseases of sugar beet causing dramatic reduction in yield and quality. Because of the rapid spread of rhizomania in sugar beet fields, successful production of the crop is not possible without the use of highly tolerant cultivars. The aim of this study was to compare some of the agronomic characteristics of rhizomania-resistant hybrids with domestic and foreign commercial varieties. The study was carried out in randomized complete block design with four replications in four regions including Karaj, Mashhad, Miandoab and Zarghan in 2013-14. Seven promising hybrids together with three domestic (one susceptible and two tolerant) and two foreign cultivars as checks were evaluated. Different characteristics such as infection rate, growth score, root length and diameter, and also single root weight were measured. Infection rate was measured based on Luterbacher’s 1-9 scale. At harvest, roots were weighed and sugar content was determined. Infection rate results showed that roots produced in Karaj in 2014 and Miandoab in 2015 were free from the symptoms and therefore, these two regions were considered as non-contaminated environments. The highest rate of infection was observed in Zarghan in both years. Overall, (7112×SB36)×SB27 was  selected as the  superior hybrid in terms of root yield, sugar content, growth and root uniformity.

Keywords

References

Anonymous. FAOSTAT [Internet]. 2016b; Avaliable fromhttp://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx
Anonymous. Peformance table of sugar beet factories, Iranian Sugar Factories Syndicate [Internet]; 2016a. Avaliable from: http://www.isfs.ir/amalkard1.htm (In Persian)
Anonymous. Testing for homogeneity of variance with Hartley’s Fmax test [Internet]. 2013; Avaliable fromhttp://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/grahamh/RM1web/Testing%20for%20homogeneity%20of%20variance.pdf.
Asher MCJ. Rhizomania: Recent development. Brit. Sugar Beet Rev. 1994; 62 (4): 10-12.
Blunt SJ, Asher MJC, Gilligan CA. Infection of sugar beet by P.betae in relation to soil temperature. Plant Pathol. 1991; 40: 257-267.
Canova A. Si studia la rizomania della bietola. Informatore Fitopatologico. 1966; 10: 235-239.
Cariolle M. Rhizomanie - mesures de prophylaxie en france et dans d’autres pays. Proceedings of 50th International Institute Sugar Beet Research Winter Congress; 1987 Feb 11-12; Bruxelles. 1987.  P. 63-79.
Dosenovic IS, Radivojevic SG, Kabc DR, Pajic DP, Skrbiac KZ. Evaluation of quality of sugar beet grown on soils highly infected with rhizomania. Zbornik Matice Srpske za Prirodne Nauke, 2006; 110: 75-83.
Draycott AP. Sugar Beet. Blackwell Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd., London, UK.2006.
Fathi MR, Vahedi S, Bazrafshan M, Shabazi HA, Abodlahian Noghabe M. Development of sugar beet hybrids carrying rhizomania resistance gene and comparison of their performance and quality. Seed and Plant Improv.  2013; 29(4): 777-789. (in Persian)
Gahramanian G, Tabatabaee Far A. Effect of different tillage methods on the sugar beet growth monotousness for mechanized harvesting. 10th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture; 2008; Oct.14-17, Antalya- Turkiye.P. 91-96.
Harju VA, Mumford RA, Blockley A, Boonham N, Clover G RG, Weekes R, Henry CM. Occurrence in the United Kingdom of beet necrotic yellow vein virus isolates which contain RNA 5. Plant Pathol. 2002; 51(6): 811.
Heijbroek W. Dissemination of rhizomania by water, soil and manure. Proceedings of 50th International Institute Sugar Beet Research Winter Congress; 1987; Feb. 11-12.  Bruxelles. P. 35-43.
Izadpanah K, Hashemi P, Kamran R, Sahandpour A, Masumi M. Widespread occurrence of rhizomania-like disease of sugar beet in Fars. Plant Pathol. 1996; .32: 200-206. (in Persan)
Kajiyama T, Yoshizawa A, Yoshida T, Yanagisawa A, Yoshimura Y, Ohtsuchi K, Abe H, Niura T. Response of sugar beet varieties to rhizomania disease of sugar beet. I. The yield and quality of sugar beet. Proceedings of Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. 1999. 32: 53-58
Kaya R, Erdiller G. Alpullu Şeker Fabrikası’nın ekim alanlarında rhizomania hastalığının toprak özellikleri ile ilişkisi. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Kongresi Bildirileri. 2001; 3-8 Eylül. Tekirdağ. 168-180.
Kaya R. Distrbution of rhizomania disease in sugar beet growing areas of Turkey. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009; 15(4): 332-340.
Keskin B. Polymyxa betae n.sp., ein parasit in den wurzeln von Beta vulgaris Tournefort, besondersweahrend der jungendentwicklung der zuckerrübe. Arch. Microbio. 1964;  49: 348-378.
Koenig RD, Lannefors BL. Molecular analyses of European A, B and P type sources of beet necrotic yellow win virus and detection of rare P type in Kazakhstan, Arch. Virol. 2000; 145(8): 1561-1570.
Luterbacher M, Asher MJC, Beyer W, Mandolino G, Scholten OE, Frese L, Biancardi E, Stevanato P, Mechelke W, Slyvchenko O. Sources of resistance to diseases of sugar beet in related beta germplasm: Soil borne diseases. Euphytica 2005; 141: 49-63.
Mohammadaian R, Mahmoudi SB, Shabazi HA, Darabi S, Pedram A. PerformanceofSugar BeetHybridsinDifferent Levels of RhizomaniaDisease Severity. The Plant Produc. 2016; 39(2): 27-42.
Nenadic N, Nedic M, Zivanovic Lj, Kolaric Lj, Gujanicic T. Effect of genotype on sugar beet yield and quality. Agric. Sci. 2003; 48(1): 1-9.
Pferdmenges F, Korf H, Varrelmann M. Identification of rhizomania-infected soil in Europe able to overcome Rz1 resistance in sugar beet and comparison with other resistance-breaking soils from different geographic origins. Europ. Plant Pathol. 2009; 124: 31-43.
Pourrahim R, Afzali H, Kakoeinejad M. Survey of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus- BNYVV in sugar beet fields in five main provinces of IRAN. 2015; Final Report. Iranian Research Institue for Plant Protection. 22 p.  (in Persian)
Putz C, Merdinoglu D, Lemaire O, Stocky G, Valentin P, Wiedemann S. Beet necrotic yellow vein virus, causal agent of sugar beet rhizomania. Rev. Plant Pathol. 1990; 69:247-254
Radivojević S, Kabić D, Filipović V, Jaćimović G. Yield and technological quality of modern sugar beet varieties in the Republic of  SERBIA. Food and Feed Res. 2008; 35(2): 53-58.
Rezaei J, Banayan Aval M, Nezame A, Mahmoodi B. Physiological behavior in response to sugar beet rhizomania virus. Plant Protec. 2014a; 28(1): 138-146. (in Persian)
Rezaei J, Bannayan M, Nezami A, Mehrvar M, Mahmoodi B. 2014a. Growth analysis of rhizomania infected and healthy sugar beet. Crop Sci. 2014b; 17(2): 59-69.
Scholten OE, Lang W. Breeding for resistance to rhizomania in sugar beet: A review. Euphytica. 2000. 112(3): 219-231.
Suarez MB,  Grondona I, Garcia-Benavides P, Monte E, Garcia-Acha I. Characterization of beet necrotic yellow vein furovirus from Spanish sugar beet. Int. Microbiol. 1999; 2 (2): 87-92.
Tamada T. Beet necrotic yellow vein virus. CMI/AAB.Description of Plant Viruses. 1975; 144. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, UK.
Tosic M, Sutic D, Milovanovic M. Investigations of sugar-beet rhizomania in Yugoslavia. Proceedings of 48th International Institute of Sugar Beet Research Winter Congress. 1985; Feb. 13-14; Bruxelles. 431-445.
Uchkunov I, Raykov S, Uchkunov V, Tanova K, Mehmed A. Productivity and resistance of parental forms and hybrid of sugar beet which are tolerant to rhizomania disease. Int. Res. Studies. Agric. Sci. 2016; 2( 1), 1-5.
Whitney ED. Identification, distribution and testing for resistance to rhizomania in Beet maritima. Plant Disease, 1989; 73: 287-290.
Zelyazkov D, Uchkunov I. Testing of parental forms and hybrids of sugar beet Rhizomania tolerant. Scientific works of NCAS. 2005;  3: 339-342.
Journal of Sugar Beet
Volume 33, Issue 1
June 2017
Pages 31-17

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics