Selection of the best domestic and foreign varieties of sugar beet for cultivation in the north of west azarbaijan province using the genotype selection index Ideal

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Assistant professor of Sugar Beet seed Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

2 Associate professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

3 Researcher of Karnaeh Ofogh Nilgoun Company, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In order to identify and select the best domestic and foreign cultivars for cultivation in North West Azerbaijan region, Poldasht city, 10 domestic and five foreign cultivars were compared in two crop seasons of 2021 and 2022. Cultivars were sown in randomized complete block design with four replications and selection was done based on selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG). Based on the results, the highest range of variation was related to the traits of root yield (28.7 t ha-1) and extraction coefficient of sugar (12.5%) and the lowest value was related to the traits of nitrogen content (1.6) and molasses sugar (1.8), respectively. In this study, in order to calculate the SIIG, it was assumed that cultivars with the highest root yield, sugar yield, white sugar yield, white sugar content, and extraction coefficient of sugar, and on the other hand, with the lowest amount of root impurities including Na, K, amino-N and molasses sugar level were ideal. According to the results, a domestic cultivar Nika obtained the highest SIIG (0.83) and Anaconda, Isabella and Aria cultivars placed in the next ranks. Among studied traits, the SIIG showed the only significant (P<0.01) and positive correlation with the traits of white sugar content (r = 0.82) and extraction coefficient of sugar (r = 0.97).

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abdollahi Hesar A, Sofalian O, Alizadeh B, Asghari A, Zali M. Evaluation of some autumn rapeseed genotypes based on morphological traits and SIIG index. Journal of Crop Breeding. 2020; 12: 151-159. doi:10.29252/jcb.12.34.151. [In Persian]
Abdollahian noghabi M, Shikholeslami R, Babaee B. Technical terms of sugar beet quantity and quality. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2005; 21: 101-104. doi:10.22092/JSB.2005.8201. [In Persian]
Ahmadi J, Taghizadeh A A, Pirkhezri M. Investigation of the Suitability of Greengage Genotypes in Karaj Climate Using the Adjusted Selection Index of Ideal Genotype. Plant Genetic Researches. 2023; 9(2):109-122. doi:10.22034/pgr.9.2.9. [In Persian]
Anonymous, 2023. http://www.isfs.ir/amartakhassosi1.htm
Azizi H, Hasani M, Pedram A. Using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) in selection of new sugar beet domestic hybrids. Proceedings of the 5th national conference on climate change and its impact on agriculture and environment; 2022 Sep 22; Urmia, Iran; pp. 644-650. [In Persian]
Cook D, Scott R. The sugar beet crop: science into practice. Champan and Hall Press, New York, USA. 1993. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0373-9.
Fasahat P, Aghaeezadeh M, Kakueinezhad M, Jabbari L. A meta-analysis of genotype× environment interaction on sugar beet performance. Biometrical Letters. 2020; 57(2): 221-236. doi:10.2478/bile.2020-0014.
Fullgrabe H, Claassen N, Hilmer R, Koch HJ, Dittert K, Kreszies T. Potassium deficiency reduces sugar yield in sugar beet through decreased growth of young plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2022; 185(5): 545-553. doi:10.1002/jpln.202200064.
Gauch HG, Zobel RW. Using interaction in two-way tables. In: Milliken GA, Schwenke JR, editors. Proceedings of the 1989 Kansas State University Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture; 1989. P. 205-213. doi:10.4148/2475-7772.1467.
Gholizadeh A, Ghaffari M, Shariati F. Use of selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) in order to select new high yielding sunflower hybrids with desirable agronomic characteristics. Journal of Crop Breeding. 2021; 13(38): 116-123. doi:10.52547/jcb.13.38.116. [In Persian]
Orazizadeh MR, Ghaemi AR, Nieromand JM, Fotouhi K, Mierzaee MR, Moharam Zadeh, M, Pedram A, Javaheri MA. Evaluation of the quality and quantity of monogerm commercial sugar beet varieties in different climates of the country. Final report, Sugar Beet Seed Institute, 2006; pp.54. [In Persian]
Pesek J, Baker RJ. Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1969; 49: 803-804.
Reinfeld E, Emmerich A, Baumgarten G, Winner C, Beiss U. Zur voraussage des melassez zuckersaus ruben analysen zucker. Zucker. 1974; 27: 2-15.
Richards RA. Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2000; 51: 447–458. doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.447.
Smith HF. A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann Eugen. 1936; 7: 240-250. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x
Solat Petloo N, Asghari Zakaria R, Ebadi A, Sharifi Ziveh P. Selection of Cow Cockle (Vaccaria hispanica) Ecotypes based on Agronomic Traits under Different Irrigation Regimes. Journal of Crop Breeding. 2022; 14(43): 135-144. doi:10.52547/jcb.14.43.135. [In Persian]
Stroup WW, Mulitze DK. Nearest neighbor adjusted best linear unbiased prediction. The American Statistician. 1991; 45(3): 194-200. doi:10.2307/2684289.
Zali H, Barati A. Evaluation of selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) in other to selection of barley promising lines with high yield and desirable agronomy traits. Journal of Crop Breeding. 2020; 12(34): 93-104. doi:10.29252/jcb.12.34.93. [In Persian]
Zali H, Barati A, Mehdi Jabari M. Using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) in selection of barley promising lines. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 2022; 32(1): 293-307. doi:10.22034/SAPS.2021.44491.2633. [In Persian]
Zali H, Sofalian O, Hasanloo T, Asghari A, Hoseini SM. Appraising of drought tolerance relying on stability analysis indices in canola genotypes simultaneously, using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique: Introduction of new method. Biological Forum-An International Journal. 2015; 7: 425-436.
Journal of Sugar Beet
Volume 39, Issue 1
September 2023
Pages 13-24

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics