The effect and elimination of the settled soil on jimsonweed’s shoot on efficacy of clopyralid

Document Type : Short paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu- Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

2 Master expert of Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

Abstract

Clopyralid is an important herbicide for controlling the broadleaf weeds in sugar beet fields, but the effect of spray volume and soil settled on the shoot of weeds on its efficacy has not been studied yet. Therefore, a greenhouse study in factorial design (3×2×5) based on completely randomized design was conducted. The first factor included the amount of soil settled on jimsonweed foliage (0, 20 kgha-1 via a dust chamber, and 20 kg ha-1 via muddy rain), the second factor composed of airflow before spraying (0 and 6 kmh-1) and the third factor included spray volume (120, 240, 360, 480, and 600 lha-1). In the absence of soil on the shoot, the highest level of jimsonweed control (> 94%) was obtained with the use of clopyralid at 120 l ha-1. Under the same condition, the efficacy of clopyralid decreased with increasing the spray volume. In the presence of soil on the shoot via both methods, the lowest level of jimsonweed control (25%) was obtained with the use of clopyralid at 120 lha-1. Under the same condition, the efficacy of clopyralid increased with increasing the spray volume. At all spray volumes (except at 120 lha-1), the negative effect of soil settled on the shoot of jimsonweed via muddy rain was greater than dust chamber. Flowing air before spraying was only useful when the source of soil settled on the shoot of jimsonweed was dust chamber. In the presence of soil on the shoot of weed, more spraying volume, but in the absence of soil, low spraying volume is recommended for the use of clopyralid.  

Keywords


Aliverdi A, Ahmadvand G. Tank-mix adjuvants to reduce the adverse effect of muddy rain on the activity of paraquat against winter wild oat. Crop Protection. 2020; 128: 105013.
Aliverdi A, Ganbari A, Rashed-Mohassel MH, Nassiri-Mahallati M, Zand E. Overcoming the antagonistic effect from spray carrier minerals on imazethapyr activity. Agronomy Journal. 2014; 106(5): 1569-1573.
Aliverdi A, Karami S, Ahmadvand G. The Effect of adjuvant mepiquat and spray volume on the adverse effect of dust on non-selective contact herbicides’ efficacy on winter wild oat. Iranian Journal of Weed Science. 2020; Articles in Press. https://ijws.areeo.ac.ir/article_121538_en.html (In Persian, abstract in English)
Butts TRSamples CAFranca LXDodds DMReynolds DBAdams JWZollinger RKHowatt KAFritz BKClint HWKruger GR. Spray droplet size and carrier volume effect on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy. Pest Management Science. 2018; 74: 2020-2029.
Damanakis M, Drennan DSH, Fryer JD, Holly K. The effect of soil dust and tap water on the toxicity of paraquat applications to leaves. Weed Research. 1970; 10: 378–381.
FAO. 2018. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed 12 Apr. 2020)
Izadi-Darbandi E, Aliverdi A, Anabestani M, Shamsabadi A. Adjuvants to improve phenmedipham+ desmedipham+ ethofumesate efficacy against weeds in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Planta Daninha. 2019; 37: e019185430.
Knoche M. Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Protection. 1994; 13: 163-178.
Kogan M, Zuniga M. Dew and spray volume effect on glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technology. 2001; 15: 590-593.
Lesnik M, Kramberger B, Vajs S. The effects of drift-reducing nozzles on herbicide efficacy and maize (Zea mays L.) yield. Zemdirbyste. 2012; 99: 371-378.
Magno Jet. 2015. Product Catalogue. http://www.magnojet.com.br/produtos (accessed 12 Apr. 2020)
Mc Mullan PM. Utility adjuvants. Weed Technology. 2000; 14(4): 792-797.
Meyer CJ, Norsworthy JK, Kruger GR, Barber TL. Effect of nozzle selection and spray volume on droplet size and efficacy of Engenia tank-mix combinations. Weed Technology. 2016; 30: 377-390.
Naghib- Alsadati M, Babaei S, Tahmasebi I, Kiani H. Evaluation of airborne dust effect on the efficiency of Atlantis OD, clodinafop propargyl and 2,4-D+M CPA herbicides on weed control in wheat. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 2020; 50(4): 1-11. (In Persian, abstract in English)
Nosratti I, Saeidi M, Barbastegan H, Jalali-Honarmand S, Ghobadi M. Effect of airborne particles on herbicides efficiency for control of corn (Zea mays) weeds in Kermanshah region. Research in Crop Ecosystems. 2016; 3: 55-66. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Norris JL, Shaw DR, Snipes CE. Weed control from herbicide combinations with three formulations of glyphosate. Weed Technology. 2001;15(3):552-8.
Rezayee- Banafshe M, Sarafroozeh F, Jalali T. The Study of daily extreme temperature and precipitation in Urmia Lake basin. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning. 2012; 16: 43-74. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Rytwo G, Tropp D. Improved efficiency of a divalent herbicide in the presence of clay, by addition of monovalent organocations. Applied Clay Science. 2001; 18: 327-333.
Shahbazi T, Saeedi M, Nosrati I, Jalai-Honarmand S. Evaluation of the effect of airborne particles on herbicides efficiency on weed control in wheat (Tritucum aestivum). Research in Crop Ecosystems. 2015; 2: 63-72. (In Persian, abstract in English)
Shahsavani A, Yarahmadi M, Mesdaghinia A, Younesian M, Jaafarzadeh-Haghighifard N, Naimabadi A, Salesi M, Naddafi K. Analysis of dust storms entering Iran with emphasis on Khuzestan province. Hakim Research Journal. 2012; 15: 192-202. (In Persian, abstract in English)
Zand E, Baghestani MA. Weed Resistance to Herbicide. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad. 2002. pp. 176. (in Persian)
Zand E, Nezamabadi N, Baghestani MA, Shimi P, Mousavi SK. A guide to chemical control of weeds in Iran. Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad. 2019. pp. 154. (In Persian)
Zhou J, Tao B, Messersmith CG. Soil dust reduces glyphosate efficacy. Weed Science. 2006; 54: 1132-1136.