Evaluation of bolting, quantitative and qualitative traits of triploid hybrids in autumn- sowing sugar beet

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 faculty member

2 Directorate of sugar beet research institute

3 Head of breeding of sugar beet

4 Chief of sugar beet researches section

Abstract

Bolting results in fibrous root formation, impurity increase and quality reduction in sugar beet. In order to develop bolting tolerant hybrid, 464 tetraploid pollinators were evaluated in three regions including Kashmar, Darab, and Moqan, Iran in 2009-10. Eleven selected pollinators were crossed with a diploid female parent. Bolting tolerance and quantitative and qualitative traits of triploid hybrids together with five tolerant controls were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with four replications at Safiabad Agriculture Research Centre in 2011-12.Significant difference was observed among cultivars for bolting percentage. The minimum (1.02%) and maximum (8%) bolting was observed in (474*7112)*(19669–9–HSF–4) and (474*7112)*(19669–11–HSF–8) hybrids, respectively. Significant difference was observed among the hybrids for root yield and white sugar yield. The maximum (9.80t.ha-1) and maximum (5.83 t.ha-1) white sugar yield was obtained in (474*7112)*(19669–2–HSF–4) and (474*7112)*(12460–2–HSF–2) hybrids, respectively. Based on the results, hybrids derived from the pollinators 19669–9–HSF–4 and 19669–11–HSF–8 showed the minimum and maximum bolting percentage, respectively. In conclusion, the hybrid (474*7112)*(19669–7–HSF–2) is recommended as superior hybrid for sowing in Khuzestan province and similar regions.

Keywords

References

Habib Khodaee A.  Examination of bolting resistance of sugar beet parents in resultant hybrids.  M Sc Thesis, Agricultural College, Islamic Azad University of Karaj. 2003. Karaj, Iran. (in Persian)
Guan GP, Abe J, Shimamoto, Y. Genetic analysis of bolting in sugar beets using a gene for annularity (B). 1994,  In: Proc 7th Int. Cong. of Soc Adv Breed Res in Asia and Oceania, Faculty of Agriculture. Hokkaido University, Sappor Japan., 247–252.
Jaggard KW, Werker AR. An evaluation at the potential benefits and of autumn–sown sugar beet in NW. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1999. 132: 91-102.
Javaheri MA, Ramrodi M, Azgharpour MR, Dehmardeh M, ghaemi A. Agroclimatic zonation for evaluating autumn sugar beet sowing feasibility in Khorasan Razavi and Khorasan-e-Jonobi Provinces. Journal  og Sugar beer, 2016, 1(31):17-31. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Jehade Akbar MR, ebrahimian HR, Fatholah Taleghani D. Autumn-Sowing sugar beet in Ardestan of Esfahan province .36th  annual Conference of Iranian sugar Factories syndicate , Karaj, Iran, , 2016, Apr. 6-7(in Persian)
Johnson BO. Development of a winter beet alternative for S. Europe. 62th IIRB Congress, 7-10 June Sevill, Spain. 1999.
Kaffka S.  Sugar beet  production and the environment. Annual  report  of  the  California  sugar  beet  growers Association. 1996.
Niazian M, Rajabi A, Amiri R, orazizadeh MR, Sharifi H. Relationship among  effective traits on root yield and sugar content in different  sugar beet O-type genotypes for autumn sowing. Journal of Plant productions-Chamran University, 2012, 35(2):115-135.  (in Persian, abstract in English)
Niazian M, Rajabi A, Amiri R, orazizadeh MR, Sharifi H. Study of general and specific combining  for Cercospora and bolting, yield and technological traits in sugar beet lines by diallel analysis. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 2011. 42(2):295-303. (in Persian, abstract in English)
Sadeghian SY, Becker HC, Johansson E. Inheritance of bolting in three sugar beet crosses after different periods of verbalization. Plant Breeding. 1993; 110: 328-333.
Sadeghian SY, Khodaee A. Diallel cross analysis of germination traits in sugar beet. Euphytica. 1998; 103: 259-263.
Sadeghian SY, Sharifi H. Improvement of sugar beet for combined resistance to bolting and cercospora leaf spot, proceedings of the 62th IIRB congress, 7-11 June Sevill, Spain. 1999.
Sadeghian SY, Ranji ZA, Habib Khodaee A, Aghaeezadeh M. Introduction of two new sugar beet varieties. Sugar Beet Seed Institute. Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization. 2004.
Smith GA, Martin SS. Differential response of sugar beet cultivar to cercospora leaf spot disease. Crop Sci. 1978; 18: 39-41.
Taleghani DF, Sadeghzadeh S, Mesbah M. Strategic framework for sugar beet research. Published by Sugar Beet Seed Institute. 2011; P 520. (in Persian)
Journal of Sugar Beet
Volume 32, Issue 2
October 2016
Pages 99-106

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics