Resistance evaluation and identification of new sugar beet pollinator lines resistant to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot

Document Type : Scientific - Research

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Hamedan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran.

3 Associate Professor in Weed Science, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

10.22092/jsb.2024.366460.1364

Abstract

Rhizoctonia root and crown rot is one of the most important diseases in sugar beet fields of Iran. Production cost reduction, especially pesticides reduction cause to increase the efficiency of disease control by using resistant varieties. Therefore, it is necessary to continuously develop new resistant hybrids and the role of pollinator in obtaining sugar beet hybrid cultivar is so important. In order to evaluate the resistant pollinator lines, 27 pollinator lines along with two resistant checks (FC 709-2 and Novodoro) and one susceptible check (191) were evaluated for Rhizoctonia resistance under artificial inoculation with Rh133 isolate based on randomized complete block design with three replications in microplot conditions of Hamedan in 2022. The evaluation methods were using of SIIG index, cluster and biplot analysis. The pollinator lines No.2, No.21, No.1, No.20, No.5 and No.10 provided the greatest value of SIIG index and displayed the minimal deviation from the ideal pollinator line. Cluster analysis divided sugar beet lines into six groups. Our results showed that three lines of No.1, No.2 and No.21 that were placed within a similar group with Novodoro resistant control in the first cluster and also four lines of No.5, No.9, No.10 and No.20 that were situated within a similar group with FC 709-2 resistant control in the fourth cluster, were recognized as resistant lines. Biplot results illustrated that the lines No.1, No.2, No.20, No.21, No.10 and No.5 were located in suitable position from biplot based on resistance indices. In general, the pollinator lines No.1 (S1 – 140279), No.2 (S1 – 140282), No.5 (S1 – 140287), No.10 (S1 – 140296), No.20 (S1 – 140316) and No.21 (S1 – 140321), which were recognized as resistant lines can be suggested for future breeding programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Basati J, Sheikholeslami M, Jalilian A, Neamati A,  Habib khodaie A. Development of diploid pollinator for resistance to powdery mildew disease in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2013; 29 (1): 1-13. (In Persian). Doi:https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2013.2939
Bolton M. D, Panella L, Campbell L, Khan M. Temperature, moisture, and fungicide effects in managing Rhizoctonia root and crown rot of sugar beet. Phytopathology. 2010; 100: 689-697. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1094 /PHYTO-100-7-0689
Buhre C, Kluth C, Burcky K, Marlander B, Varrelmann M. Integrated control of root and crown rot in sugar beet: combined effects of cultivar, crop rotation, and soil tillage. Plant Disease. 2009; 93: 155-161. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-2-0155
Buttner G, Pfahler B,  Marlander B. Greenhouse and field techniques for testing sugar beet for resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot. Plant Breeding. 2004; 123: 158-166. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00967.x
Colquhoun J.B, Chapman SA, Gevens AJ, Groves RL, Heider DJ, Jensen BM, Nice GR.W, Ruark MD, Wang Y. Commercial vegetable production in Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin Extension. 2020. (Available at https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0145/8808/4272/files/A3422-2021.pdf. Accessed 13 April, 2020).
Ebrahimi Koulaei H, Mansouri H, Aghaeezadeh M, Mohammadian R, Soltani J, Fotouhi K, Sharifi M. Evaluation of yield potential and resistance to Rhizoctonia (Rhizoctonia solani) disease of new sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) hybrids. Iranian Journal Crop Science. 2019; 21(2): 173-187. (In Persian). Doi: http://doi.org/10.29252/abj.21.2.173    
Fattahi SH, Zafari D, Mahmoudi SB. Evaluation of superior sugar beet genotypes for resistance to important root rot pathogens in the greenhouse. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2011; 27(1): 25-38. (In Persian). Doi: http://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2011.682  
Hamze H, Hassani M, Mansouri H. Screening O-type lines of sugar beet in terms of resistance to rhizoctonia root rot. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2022; 37 (2): 153-165. (In Persian). Doi:https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2022.357181.1296  
Hamze H, Mansouri H, Hasani M, Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S. Evaluation of new O-type lines of sugar beet resistant to root and crown rhizoctonia rot in the conditions of microplot artificial contamination. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2024; 39 (2): 125-138. (In Persian). Doi: http://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2024.365029.1347  
Haque ME, Parvin MS. Sugar beet, it’s disease rhizoctonia root rot, and potential biological agents. Agricultural and Biological Research. 2021; 37 (1): 96-101. Doi: http://doi.org/10.35248/0970-1907.21.37.96-101    
Harveson R M, Rush CM. The influence of irrigation frequency and cultivar blends on the severity of multiple root diseases in sugar beets. Plant Disease. 2002; 86: 901-908. Doi: http://doi:10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.8.901    
Harveson RM. Identifying and distinguishing seedling and root rot diseases of sugar beets. Plant Health Progress. 2006; 7 (1). Doi: http://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2006-0915-01-DG.
Harveson RM, Hanson LE, Hein GL. Compendium of beet diseases and pests, 2rd Edition. The American Phytopathological Society, APS Press, St Paul, MN, USA, 2009 pp. 140. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/9780890546598.
Katharina S, Wigg F, Goldman L. Variability in reaction to root and crown rot caused by rhizoctonia solani among table beet cultivars, breeding lines, and plant introductions in controlled environment conditions. Horticultural Science. 2020; 55(9):148-1494. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15011-20.
Kluth C, Verrelmann M. Maize genotype susceptibility to Rhizoctonia solani and its effect on sugar beet crop rotations. Crop Protection. 2010; 29: 230-238. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.12.002.
Mahmoudi SB, Mesbah M, Azizollah A, Ebrahimi Koulaei H. Comparison of different methods for evaluation of the resistance to Rhizoctonia root and crown rot in selected genotypes of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 2003; 19: 1-22. (In Persian). Doi: http://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2003.7149  
Mall A, Misra K, Lal  RJ, Kumar M, Santeshwari A, Kumar Pathak AD. Rhizoctonia root rot: A threatening disease of sugar beet incited by Rhizoctonia species. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology. 2020; 35 (02): 1-4.
Mansouri H. Screening of sugar beet full-sib lines for resistance to Rhizoctonia root rot under artificial inoculation. 2021. Final report of sugar beet seed institute, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian).
Mansouri H, Hamze H, Hassani M. Identification of Resistant Pollinator Lines to Soil-Borne Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn, 1858 in Sugar Beet Using SIIG Technique. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus. 2024; 89 (3): 199-208.
McGrath JM, Panella L. Sugar beet breeding. 167-218. In: Panella L. (Ed.). Plant Breeding Reviews. Somerset, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2019
McGrath JM, Hanson LE, Panella L. Registration of SR98 sugar beet germplasm with resistances to rhizoctonia seedling and crown and root rot diseases. Journal of Plant Registrations. 2015; 9: 227–231. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3198/jpr2013.08.0052crg
Panella L. Root rots. pp. 95-100. In: Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN.(Eds.). de Biaggi M. eds. Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH. 2005.
Parmeter JRJ, Whitney HS. Taxonomy and nomenclature of the imperfect state. pp. 7-19. In Parmeter J. (Ed.). Biology and Pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. University of California Press, Berkeley. 1970. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520318243-004
Pethybridge SJ, Kikkert JR, Hanson LE, Nelson SC. Challenges and prospects for building resilient disease management strategies and tactics for the New York table beet industry. Agronomy. 2018; 8: 112 :1-17. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8070112
Strausbaugh CA, Eujayl IA, Panella LW, Hanson LE. Virulence, distribution, and diversity of Rhizoctonia solani from sugar beet in Idaho and Oregon. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2011; 33: 210-226. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2011.558523
Strausbaugh CA. Leuconostoc spp. associated with root rot in sugar beet and their interaction with Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of Phytopathology. 2016; 106: 432-441. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-15-0325-R
Stojsin V, Budakov D, Jacobsen B, Bagi F, Grimme E, Neher O. Analysis of Rhizoctonia solani isolates associated with sugar beet crown and root rot from Serbia. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011; 10(82):19049-55. Doi: http://doi:10.5897/AJB11.2708  
Vahedi S, Fotouhi K, BazrAfshan M, Soltani J, Orazizadeh M, Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S. Evaluation of diploid sugar beet pollinators resistant to rhizomania disease. Proceedings of 22nd Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 27-30 August, 2016. Karaj, Iran. (In Persian).
Windels C. E, Kuznia R.A, Call J. Characterization and pathogenicity of Thanatephorus cucumeris from sugar beet in Minnesota. Plant Disease. 1997; 81: 245-249. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.3.245 
Zali H, Sofalian O, Hasanloo T, Asgharii A, Hoseini S.M. Appraising of drought tolerance relying on stability analysis indices in canola genotypes simultaneously, using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique: Introduction of new method. Biological Forum. 2015; 7(2): 703-711.
Journal of Sugar Beet
Volume 40, Issue 1
February 2025
Pages 31-46

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics