<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluation of sugar beet commercial cultivars resistance to rhizoctonia root rot in greenhouse and field conditions</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluation of sugar beet commercial cultivars resistance to rhizoctonia root rot in greenhouse and field conditions</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>10</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125858</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2022.355407.1282</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shekholeslami</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Plant Pests and Diseases Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jalilian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Younesi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of Plant Pests and Diseases Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Rhizoctonia root rot mainly caused by &lt;em&gt;Rhizoctonia solani&lt;/em&gt; AG 2-2 and &lt;em&gt;R. solani&lt;/em&gt; AG-4 is a sugar beet disease in Iran. In this study, the resistance of foreign and domestic commercial cultivars, available to farmers, against both pathogenic groups of AG 2-2 and AG 4 was evaluated in greenhouse and field conditions. Under greenhouse condition, 18 cultivars were planted in pots along with a control cultivar (Jolgeh) and after 8-weeks, seedlings were inoculated with corn seeds infected with &lt;em&gt;R. solani&lt;/em&gt; AG 2-2 and &lt;em&gt;R. solani&lt;/em&gt; AG 4 isolates. Six weeks after inoculation, the intensity of contamination on the roots of each plant was measured based on a nine-point scale (1 to 9). For field evaluation, cultivars were planted in a contaminated field in 50-m-long rows with three replications and the intensity of root infection was evaluated at harvest. Results showed that there was a significant difference between cultivars and susceptible control and also among cultivars in both greenhouse and field conditions. Also, the general response of cultivars to both pathogenic groups was similar. In total, Ekbatan, Iris, Aigrette, Novodoro, Ivano, Novella, Tourelle, Modex, Efesos and Cadet cultivars had the lowest infection under different trial conditions.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Rhizoctonia root rot mainly caused by &lt;em&gt;Rhizoctonia solani&lt;/em&gt; AG 2-2 and &lt;em&gt;R. solani&lt;/em&gt; AG-4 is a sugar beet disease in Iran. In this study, the resistance of foreign and domestic commercial cultivars, available to farmers, against both pathogenic groups of AG 2-2 and AG 4 was evaluated in greenhouse and field conditions. Under greenhouse condition, 18 cultivars were planted in pots along with a control cultivar (Jolgeh) and after 8-weeks, seedlings were inoculated with corn seeds infected with &lt;em&gt;R. solani&lt;/em&gt; AG 2-2 and &lt;em&gt;R. solani&lt;/em&gt; AG 4 isolates. Six weeks after inoculation, the intensity of contamination on the roots of each plant was measured based on a nine-point scale (1 to 9). For field evaluation, cultivars were planted in a contaminated field in 50-m-long rows with three replications and the intensity of root infection was evaluated at harvest. Results showed that there was a significant difference between cultivars and susceptible control and also among cultivars in both greenhouse and field conditions. Also, the general response of cultivars to both pathogenic groups was similar. In total, Ekbatan, Iris, Aigrette, Novodoro, Ivano, Novella, Tourelle, Modex, Efesos and Cadet cultivars had the lowest infection under different trial conditions.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cultivar</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pathogenic group</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rhizoctonia root rot</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125858_15a7daa526e3b62423de7fba73eb3dab.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluation of different nitrogen fertilizer levels and foliar spray of zinc sulfate on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of two cultivars in autumn sugar beet cultivation</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluation of different nitrogen fertilizer levels and foliar spray of zinc sulfate on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of two cultivars in autumn sugar beet cultivation</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>11</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>26</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125857</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2022.353333.1262</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Haqshenas</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student of Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Kh.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Azizi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghasemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute(SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>F.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nazarian Firouzabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>10</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as well as foliar spray of zinc sulfat on the quality characteristics of two sugar beet cultivars in autumn cultivation. The study was conducted in a factorial design based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Faculty of Agriculture in Lorestan University during two crop seasons (2017-19). The Experimental treatments included two autumn-sown sugar beet cultivars (Chimene and Rosagold) and four fertilizer levels including F1: 138 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen (control), F2: 124 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen and foliar spray of zinc sulfate, F3: application of 110 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen and foliar spray of zinc sulfate, F4: 96.6 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen and foliar spray of zinc sulfate at a rate of 5/1000. The highest root yield (90.15 t ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) belonged to Rosagold cultivar and among the treatments, the highest root yield was related to F2 treatment. The highest sugar content (16.15%) was obtained in 20% reduction in nitrogen application and foliar spray of zinc sulfate. Also, the highest white sugar content (15.57%) was obtained from Rosagold cultivar in 20% reduction in N fertilizer application and foliar spray of zinc sulfate, which showed 26.17% increase compared with control treatment (F1). The highest molasses sugar and Na, K and α- N as 2.7, 2.61, 7.90 and 2.90 meq 100 gr beet&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively was observed in Chimene. Also, the highest bolting percentage was obtained in Chimene and the application of 300 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen. According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that autumn cultivation of sugar beet using Rosagold cultivar is possible in Khorramabad region and foliar spray of zinc sulfate can compensate the reduction of nitrogen consumption by 20% without reducing the quantity and quality of autumn sugar beet.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of reducing nitrogen fertilizer application as well as foliar spray of zinc sulfat on the quality characteristics of two sugar beet cultivars in autumn cultivation. The study was conducted in a factorial design based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Faculty of Agriculture in Lorestan University during two crop seasons (2017-19). The Experimental treatments included two autumn-sown sugar beet cultivars (Chimene and Rosagold) and four fertilizer levels including F1: 138 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen (control), F2: 124 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen and foliar spray of zinc sulfate, F3: application of 110 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen and foliar spray of zinc sulfate, F4: 96.6 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen and foliar spray of zinc sulfate at a rate of 5/1000. The highest root yield (90.15 t ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) belonged to Rosagold cultivar and among the treatments, the highest root yield was related to F2 treatment. The highest sugar content (16.15%) was obtained in 20% reduction in nitrogen application and foliar spray of zinc sulfate. Also, the highest white sugar content (15.57%) was obtained from Rosagold cultivar in 20% reduction in N fertilizer application and foliar spray of zinc sulfate, which showed 26.17% increase compared with control treatment (F1). The highest molasses sugar and Na, K and α- N as 2.7, 2.61, 7.90 and 2.90 meq 100 gr beet&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively was observed in Chimene. Also, the highest bolting percentage was obtained in Chimene and the application of 300 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; nitrogen. According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that autumn cultivation of sugar beet using Rosagold cultivar is possible in Khorramabad region and foliar spray of zinc sulfate can compensate the reduction of nitrogen consumption by 20% without reducing the quantity and quality of autumn sugar beet.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Autumn sowing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bolting</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cultivar</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">foliar spray</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Micronutrient</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125857_3c8fc96551dfa7920e7a59e79abb1229.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The effect of drought stress and transplanting method on agronomic characteristics, quantitative and qualitative yield as well as water use efficiency of different sugar beet cultivars in autumn planting</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The effect of drought stress and transplanting method on agronomic characteristics, quantitative and qualitative yield as well as water use efficiency of different sugar beet cultivars in autumn planting</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>27</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>48</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125935</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2022.352225.1252</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saeidabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student of Department of Agronomy, Jiroft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jiroft, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Gh.R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Afsharmanesh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate professor of Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center in the south of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shirzadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Department of Agronomy, Jiroft Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jiroft, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghzadeh Hemayati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of  Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) -  Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj,Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Two separate trials were conducted as a factorial design based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Shahid Moghbeli Agricultural Research Center in Jiroft, Iran in two cropping seasons (2016-17 and 2017-18). In the first trial, the effects of planting method including direct planting and transplanting on different sugar beet cultivars including Palma, Sharif, and Merak were evaluated, and then in the second trial, among studied cultivars, a high yield cultivar (Merak) was selected. Also, the effect of irrigation time (based on 50, 70, and 90% of water requirement) and planting methods on its quantitative and qualitative yield were evaluated. In the first trial, the highest root dry matter, extraction coefficient of sugar, sugar content, root weight, root length, fresh leaf weight, root yield and sugar yield were obtained for Merak cultivar and transplanting. The result of the second trial showed that the irrigation time based on 70% of water requirement led to the highest root and sugar yield along with a significant improvement in water use efficiency. In addition, as transplanting improved root yield and sugar yield, therefore, transplanting method with irrigation at the time of 70% of water requirement is recommended to obtain optimal root yield and sugar yield.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Two separate trials were conducted as a factorial design based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Shahid Moghbeli Agricultural Research Center in Jiroft, Iran in two cropping seasons (2016-17 and 2017-18). In the first trial, the effects of planting method including direct planting and transplanting on different sugar beet cultivars including Palma, Sharif, and Merak were evaluated, and then in the second trial, among studied cultivars, a high yield cultivar (Merak) was selected. Also, the effect of irrigation time (based on 50, 70, and 90% of water requirement) and planting methods on its quantitative and qualitative yield were evaluated. In the first trial, the highest root dry matter, extraction coefficient of sugar, sugar content, root weight, root length, fresh leaf weight, root yield and sugar yield were obtained for Merak cultivar and transplanting. The result of the second trial showed that the irrigation time based on 70% of water requirement led to the highest root and sugar yield along with a significant improvement in water use efficiency. In addition, as transplanting improved root yield and sugar yield, therefore, transplanting method with irrigation at the time of 70% of water requirement is recommended to obtain optimal root yield and sugar yield.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Extraction coefficient of sugar</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sugar yield</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Water use efficiency</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125935_ef54d459e1b3a0ecbc83c83849572301.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparing the quantitative, qualitative and economic yield of sugar beet planting by root transplanting method with direct seeding in Hamedan region</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparing the quantitative, qualitative and economic yield of sugar beet planting by root transplanting method with direct seeding in Hamedan region</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>49</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>60</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125859</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2022.353748.1268</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mansouri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hassani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hamze</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jafari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>V.A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yosefabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) -  Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj,Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Chaharmahali</LastName>
<Affiliation>Expert of Sugar Beet Research Department, Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Hamedan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Decreasing of water consumption, chemical inputs, production cost and risk are among the most important advantages of transplanting method. The aim of this study was to compare the transplanting and direct seeding methods in sugar beet. For this purpose, root transplanting along with direct seeding were performed in the farmer’s field in Hamedan in 2018. Sugar beet transplants were prepared in planting stock in April and transplanted to the main field in June. Direct seeding of sugar beet was performed in the main field in mid of May. During the growing season, necessary notes were taken and at the end of the season, root sampling was performed. After harvest, two planting systems were evaluated in terms of quantitative, qualitative and economic characteristics. Root transplanting system caused an increase in root yield and sugar yield by 15 and 47%, respectively compared with direct seeding system. Water consumption under root transplanting was 10080 m3 ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; which was about 18% less than direct seeding. In terms of water use efficiency, root transplanting method with an efficiency of 9.66 kg root m&lt;sup&gt;-3&lt;/sup&gt; was about 40% more than direct seeding method (6.90 kg root m&lt;sup&gt;-3&lt;/sup&gt;). The economic evaluation of two planting methods also showed that the increase in net income by changing planting pattern from conventional to root transplanting system was higher. In general, results showed that root transplanting system had higher quantitative and qualitative yield and economical income compared with direct seeding method.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Decreasing of water consumption, chemical inputs, production cost and risk are among the most important advantages of transplanting method. The aim of this study was to compare the transplanting and direct seeding methods in sugar beet. For this purpose, root transplanting along with direct seeding were performed in the farmer’s field in Hamedan in 2018. Sugar beet transplants were prepared in planting stock in April and transplanted to the main field in June. Direct seeding of sugar beet was performed in the main field in mid of May. During the growing season, necessary notes were taken and at the end of the season, root sampling was performed. After harvest, two planting systems were evaluated in terms of quantitative, qualitative and economic characteristics. Root transplanting system caused an increase in root yield and sugar yield by 15 and 47%, respectively compared with direct seeding system. Water consumption under root transplanting was 10080 m3 ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; which was about 18% less than direct seeding. In terms of water use efficiency, root transplanting method with an efficiency of 9.66 kg root m&lt;sup&gt;-3&lt;/sup&gt; was about 40% more than direct seeding method (6.90 kg root m&lt;sup&gt;-3&lt;/sup&gt;). The economic evaluation of two planting methods also showed that the increase in net income by changing planting pattern from conventional to root transplanting system was higher. In general, results showed that root transplanting system had higher quantitative and qualitative yield and economical income compared with direct seeding method.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">direct seeding</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Gross income</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Production Cost</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Transplanting</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Water use efficiency</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125859_d3093302436685da0764267653a98c97.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Effect of plastic mulch and paclobutrazol on bolting and yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Mashhad region</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Effect of plastic mulch and paclobutrazol on bolting and yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Mashhad region</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>61</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>73</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125860</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2022.354893.1277</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hamidi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Researcher of Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rezaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>K.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hajmohammadnia Ghalibaf</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sh.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zare</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Economic, Social and Extension Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this study, the effects of plastic mulch and paclobutrazol on bolting, yield and quality of autumn-sown sugar beet was studied in a split plot design based on randomized complete block design with four replications in Mashhad during two cropping seasons (2018-19 and 2019-20). Planting dates at three levels (10th, 20th and 30th of October) were allocated to main plots and bolting control at four levels (control, plastic mulch, paclobutrazol, and simultaneous application of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch) to subplots. The average reduction of bolting in plastic mulch, paclobutrazol, and simultaneous application of paclobutrazole and plastic mulch compared with control was 69.06, 32.98 and 91.88%, respectively. The treatments of plastic mulch, paclobutrazol, and simultaneous application of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch increased white sugar yield by 1.11, 1.93, and 1.19 t ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. There was no significant difference between different planting dates in terms of white sugar yield which could be due to the bolting occurrence in early planting and as a result reduction of sugar content and also the decrease in yield in late planting. In bolting control treatments, plastic mulch increased the yield by reducing about 70% of bolting on the second planting date compared with the first planting date. Results showed that the use of paclobutrazol and the simultaneous use of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch had a significant reduction in white sugar yield. On the other hand, due to the significant effect of the simultaneous application of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch on bolting reduction, it is necessary to conduct more studies regarding the amount and timing of paclobutrazol application to eliminate the negative effects on yield.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In this study, the effects of plastic mulch and paclobutrazol on bolting, yield and quality of autumn-sown sugar beet was studied in a split plot design based on randomized complete block design with four replications in Mashhad during two cropping seasons (2018-19 and 2019-20). Planting dates at three levels (10th, 20th and 30th of October) were allocated to main plots and bolting control at four levels (control, plastic mulch, paclobutrazol, and simultaneous application of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch) to subplots. The average reduction of bolting in plastic mulch, paclobutrazol, and simultaneous application of paclobutrazole and plastic mulch compared with control was 69.06, 32.98 and 91.88%, respectively. The treatments of plastic mulch, paclobutrazol, and simultaneous application of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch increased white sugar yield by 1.11, 1.93, and 1.19 t ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. There was no significant difference between different planting dates in terms of white sugar yield which could be due to the bolting occurrence in early planting and as a result reduction of sugar content and also the decrease in yield in late planting. In bolting control treatments, plastic mulch increased the yield by reducing about 70% of bolting on the second planting date compared with the first planting date. Results showed that the use of paclobutrazol and the simultaneous use of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch had a significant reduction in white sugar yield. On the other hand, due to the significant effect of the simultaneous application of paclobutrazol and plastic mulch on bolting reduction, it is necessary to conduct more studies regarding the amount and timing of paclobutrazol application to eliminate the negative effects on yield.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bolting</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Planting date</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Plastic mulch</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Root yield</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sugar yield</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125860_b789f0d1181cc5f6cdf94c2742497847.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Effect of zinc nano- chelate and mycorrhizae on biochemical properties of leaf and root yield in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris. L) under irrigation treatments</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Effect of zinc nano- chelate and mycorrhizae on biochemical properties of leaf and root yield in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris. L) under irrigation treatments</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>75</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>86</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125861</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2022.353733.1267</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>I.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Golabi Lak</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ms.c. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mir Mahmodi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Department of Agronomy, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hamze</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Hamedan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Hamedan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>To evaluate the effect of zinc nano-chelate and mycorrhizae on the biochemical properties of leaf and root yield under different irrigation levels, a split-plot design based on randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted in 2019. Irrigation treatments including irrigation after 60-, 90-, and 120-mm of evaporation from class A pan were allocated to the main plots and fertilizer treatments (control, inoculation with mycorrhiza, zinc nano-chelate, and zinc nano-chelate + mycorrhiza) to the sub-plots. In this study, irrigation after 120 mm of evaporation reduced the amount of chlorophyll a (17.01%), chlorophyll b (8.09%), carotenoid content (28.78%) and superoxide enzyme inhibition (31.14%), and increased leaf flavonoid content (25.47%), compared with irrigation after 60 mm of evaporation. Among the fertilizer treatments, zinc nano-chelate + mycorrhiza treatment had the highest chlorophyll-a (9.30 mg/g fresh weight), chlorophyll b (3.84 mg/g), carotenoid content (3.94 mg/g), superoxide enzyme inhibition (33.53 percent). The interaction effect of irrigation and fertilizer in irrigation after 60 mm of evaporation along with nano-chelate zinc + mycorrhiza fertilizer treatment had the highest nitric acid radical inhibition (23.45 percent) and root yield (82.62 t/ha), and the lowest leaf proline content (0.49 mg/g), as well as leaf phenol content (34.19 mg of gallic acid/ g dry weight). In this study, application of mycorrhiza, especially under water deficit conditions, through improving biochemical properties and regulation of antioxidant enzymes activity, was able to moderate the effect of water stress on root yield and also increase root yield compared with control.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">To evaluate the effect of zinc nano-chelate and mycorrhizae on the biochemical properties of leaf and root yield under different irrigation levels, a split-plot design based on randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted in 2019. Irrigation treatments including irrigation after 60-, 90-, and 120-mm of evaporation from class A pan were allocated to the main plots and fertilizer treatments (control, inoculation with mycorrhiza, zinc nano-chelate, and zinc nano-chelate + mycorrhiza) to the sub-plots. In this study, irrigation after 120 mm of evaporation reduced the amount of chlorophyll a (17.01%), chlorophyll b (8.09%), carotenoid content (28.78%) and superoxide enzyme inhibition (31.14%), and increased leaf flavonoid content (25.47%), compared with irrigation after 60 mm of evaporation. Among the fertilizer treatments, zinc nano-chelate + mycorrhiza treatment had the highest chlorophyll-a (9.30 mg/g fresh weight), chlorophyll b (3.84 mg/g), carotenoid content (3.94 mg/g), superoxide enzyme inhibition (33.53 percent). The interaction effect of irrigation and fertilizer in irrigation after 60 mm of evaporation along with nano-chelate zinc + mycorrhiza fertilizer treatment had the highest nitric acid radical inhibition (23.45 percent) and root yield (82.62 t/ha), and the lowest leaf proline content (0.49 mg/g), as well as leaf phenol content (34.19 mg of gallic acid/ g dry weight). In this study, application of mycorrhiza, especially under water deficit conditions, through improving biochemical properties and regulation of antioxidant enzymes activity, was able to moderate the effect of water stress on root yield and also increase root yield compared with control.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Antioxidant</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">bio-fertilizer</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">chlorophyll</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Root yield</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Water deficit</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125861_35368c9f3917eb4e292a40ba6ca5b679.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Logistic model for estimation of the yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Khuzestan province</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Logistic model for estimation of the yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Khuzestan province</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>87</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>98</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125321</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2021.354624.1276</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kamali</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Water Engineering Department, Minab Higher Education Center, and Research Group of Agro‑Ecology in Dryland Areas, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khorramian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of gricultural Engineering Research Department. Safiabad Agricultural Research and Education and Natural Resources Center, AREEO, Dezful, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Naserin</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Department of water engineering, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resource University of Khuzestan, Ahvaz, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hosseinpour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute(SBSI), Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Predicting crop yield is an important factor for efficient planning and management. In the present study, a simple mathematical model is developed for predicting the yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Khuzestan region. In this model, the logistic function was used, in which the root yield and white sugar yield is defined as a function of irrigation, rainfall and evaporation from the pan. In order to evaluate the model, data of two-year trials conducted under five treatments of drip irrigation water based on percentage of water requirement (25, 50, 75, 100 and 125%) at Safiabad Agricultural Research and Education and Natural Resources Center, Dezful, were used. Results showed that the model was able to estimate root yield and white sugar yield with good accuracy so that the normalized root mean squares error (NRMSE) for estimating root yield in the calibration and validation stage were 9.4 and 13.0%, respectively. Also, the value of NRMSE for estimating white sugar yield in both calibration and validation years was less than 10% and equal to 6.8 and 9.8%, respectively. The model is able to have good accuracy during the growing season and estimate the values of root yield and sugar yield during different days after planting (DAP) with an error of less than 20%. Considering that the model presented in the current study is an experimental model, it is recommended to first recalibrate the model, and then use it in regions with different climatic conditions.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Predicting crop yield is an important factor for efficient planning and management. In the present study, a simple mathematical model is developed for predicting the yield of autumn-sown sugar beet in Khuzestan region. In this model, the logistic function was used, in which the root yield and white sugar yield is defined as a function of irrigation, rainfall and evaporation from the pan. In order to evaluate the model, data of two-year trials conducted under five treatments of drip irrigation water based on percentage of water requirement (25, 50, 75, 100 and 125%) at Safiabad Agricultural Research and Education and Natural Resources Center, Dezful, were used. Results showed that the model was able to estimate root yield and white sugar yield with good accuracy so that the normalized root mean squares error (NRMSE) for estimating root yield in the calibration and validation stage were 9.4 and 13.0%, respectively. Also, the value of NRMSE for estimating white sugar yield in both calibration and validation years was less than 10% and equal to 6.8 and 9.8%, respectively. The model is able to have good accuracy during the growing season and estimate the values of root yield and sugar yield during different days after planting (DAP) with an error of less than 20%. Considering that the model presented in the current study is an experimental model, it is recommended to first recalibrate the model, and then use it in regions with different climatic conditions.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Drought Stress</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">low irrigation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">modeling</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">simulation</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125321_ab5519fd42ca7e73ed7ff29f691e6368.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluation of the possibility of differentiating sugar beet genotypes in terms of resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus based on phenotypic symptoms under greenhouse condition</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluation of the possibility of differentiating sugar beet genotypes in terms of resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus based on phenotypic symptoms under greenhouse condition</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>99</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>114</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">126038</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2022.353609.1263</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soltani Idliki</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO) Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.B.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahmoudi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) -  Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj,Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mehrvar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kakueinezhad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute- Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this study, two different methods were used to evaluate the resistance to rhizomania disease in the root and leaf of sugar beet cultivars Sharif, Dorotea, Aria, Sina, Isabella, Pirola, Ludwina and Brigitta under greenhouse condition. The cultivars&#039; seeds were planted in both sterile (to rub-inoculation leaves) and infection soil (to evaluate infected roots). Results of analysis of variance of greenhouse and laboratory data showed a significant difference between cultivars in terms of virus concentration (based on ELISA test) and percentage of seedling root infection among cultivars; so that the susceptible cultivar Sharif with the average contamination (70.59%) had the highest virus concentration (0.93) and on the other hand, the two cultivars Pirola and Isabella with the average contamination (21.47%) had the lowest virus concentration (0.2). Mechanical inoculation of the virus on the leaves of cultivar seedlings (method 2) showed symptoms of chlorosis and necrosis on the leaves of all cultivars in 10 days post inoculation and there was no difference between resistant and susceptible cultivars. Mechanical inoculation of sugar beet leaves resulted in local symptoms independent of genotype, and it was not possible to distinguish susceptible and resistant genotypes. Therefore, the most appropriate method is to determine the concentration of this virus in the plants’ root after two months.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In this study, two different methods were used to evaluate the resistance to rhizomania disease in the root and leaf of sugar beet cultivars Sharif, Dorotea, Aria, Sina, Isabella, Pirola, Ludwina and Brigitta under greenhouse condition. The cultivars&#039; seeds were planted in both sterile (to rub-inoculation leaves) and infection soil (to evaluate infected roots). Results of analysis of variance of greenhouse and laboratory data showed a significant difference between cultivars in terms of virus concentration (based on ELISA test) and percentage of seedling root infection among cultivars; so that the susceptible cultivar Sharif with the average contamination (70.59%) had the highest virus concentration (0.93) and on the other hand, the two cultivars Pirola and Isabella with the average contamination (21.47%) had the lowest virus concentration (0.2). Mechanical inoculation of the virus on the leaves of cultivar seedlings (method 2) showed symptoms of chlorosis and necrosis on the leaves of all cultivars in 10 days post inoculation and there was no difference between resistant and susceptible cultivars. Mechanical inoculation of sugar beet leaves resulted in local symptoms independent of genotype, and it was not possible to distinguish susceptible and resistant genotypes. Therefore, the most appropriate method is to determine the concentration of this virus in the plants’ root after two months.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Tetrad</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rhizomania</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">mRT-PCR</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">resistance</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_126038_c58ba3744dba911f44d2758ca7f06e3d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Ranking of sugar beet production areas based on physical advantage indexes of production in Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Ranking of sugar beet production areas based on physical advantage indexes of production in Iran</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>115</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>130</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125223</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2021.352345.1256</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahriari</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University. Zabol, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohammadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Keikha</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University. Zabol, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Davarpanah</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University. Zabol, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>31</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Determining the relative advantage of producing agricultural products in different regions is one of the important aspects of agricultural policy and planning, based on which an appropriate pattern of production and cultivation can be achieved in different regions according to the existing conditions in each region. The present study aimed to prioritize the sugar beet producing provinces in the country based on the indices of physical advantage of production and their fluctuation coefficient within the period of 1983-2019 using numerical taxonomy method. Results showed that during a period of 36 years, the provinces of South Khorasan, Khorasan Razavi and West Azerbaijan had the highest average of scale advantage index (SAI), and the highest average of efficiency advantage index (EAI) was achieved in the provinces of Kurdistan, Kermanshah and Ardabil as 2.90, 2.20, and 1.80, respectively. Based on the results of collective advantage (AAI), the provinces of West Azerbaijan, Khorasan Razavi and Isfahan with 0.10, 0.22 and 0.33 had the lowest coefficient of fluctuation of the collective index and with 1.93, 14.14 and 1.74, respectively had the highest average of collective advantage among all the provinces of the country.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Determining the relative advantage of producing agricultural products in different regions is one of the important aspects of agricultural policy and planning, based on which an appropriate pattern of production and cultivation can be achieved in different regions according to the existing conditions in each region. The present study aimed to prioritize the sugar beet producing provinces in the country based on the indices of physical advantage of production and their fluctuation coefficient within the period of 1983-2019 using numerical taxonomy method. Results showed that during a period of 36 years, the provinces of South Khorasan, Khorasan Razavi and West Azerbaijan had the highest average of scale advantage index (SAI), and the highest average of efficiency advantage index (EAI) was achieved in the provinces of Kurdistan, Kermanshah and Ardabil as 2.90, 2.20, and 1.80, respectively. Based on the results of collective advantage (AAI), the provinces of West Azerbaijan, Khorasan Razavi and Isfahan with 0.10, 0.22 and 0.33 had the lowest coefficient of fluctuation of the collective index and with 1.93, 14.14 and 1.74, respectively had the highest average of collective advantage among all the provinces of the country.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Comprehensive map</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">numerical taxonomy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Physical advantage</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ranking</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125223_118902bfdf316be19015f92650281c57.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluation of sugar market in terms of price fluctuations and its global consequences</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluation of sugar market in terms of price fluctuations and its global consequences</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>131</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>138</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">125225</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2021.353676.1266</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fasahat</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) -  Agricultural Research Education and Extension, Karaj,Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kakueinezhad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute- Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Recently, concerns over food and energy security, threats from global warming, and the challenges that the commodity market has faced since the new millennium have placed the agricultural market at the center of academia and policy. In this revived consciousness, sugar plays a special and essential role. The sugar market is far from the stable and conventional condition and brings more challenges and unrest alone. An unusual combination of free and protected markets, special trade agreements, and extremely volatile prices distinguishes this trade from other agricultural commodities. Historically, sugar has been one of the most volatile agricultural commodities and countering that volatility is a real challenge for market makers and policymakers. In addition, depending on domestic markets, sugar prices can vary from country to country. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of the sugar market and the medium-term forecasts for global markets for the period 2019-28. The price, production, consumption, and commercial transactions of sugar beet, sugar cane, sugar, molasses, and high fructose corn syrup are discussed. Lastly, the risks and uncertainties affecting the global sugar markets over the next ten years are discussed.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Recently, concerns over food and energy security, threats from global warming, and the challenges that the commodity market has faced since the new millennium have placed the agricultural market at the center of academia and policy. In this revived consciousness, sugar plays a special and essential role. The sugar market is far from the stable and conventional condition and brings more challenges and unrest alone. An unusual combination of free and protected markets, special trade agreements, and extremely volatile prices distinguishes this trade from other agricultural commodities. Historically, sugar has been one of the most volatile agricultural commodities and countering that volatility is a real challenge for market makers and policymakers. In addition, depending on domestic markets, sugar prices can vary from country to country. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of the sugar market and the medium-term forecasts for global markets for the period 2019-28. The price, production, consumption, and commercial transactions of sugar beet, sugar cane, sugar, molasses, and high fructose corn syrup are discussed. Lastly, the risks and uncertainties affecting the global sugar markets over the next ten years are discussed.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Price instability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sugar Market</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_125225_7ad772d4bdcfe1e4cbdfa5f5178e8081.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
