<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2003</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Determination of optimum seed size and quantity of coating materials for monogerm sugar beet seed</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Determination of optimum seed size and quantity of coating materials for monogerm sugar beet seed</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>95</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>108</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8276</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2003.8276</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>D.F.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taleghani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute – Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dehghanshoar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute – Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghasemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute – Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>V.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yossefabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute – Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Chegini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute – Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mesbah</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute – Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>F.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hamdi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute – Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In order to determination of optimum quantity of seed pelleting materials due to sugar beet monogerm seed size. This study was carried out in seed technology department during 1997-1998. Monogerm cultiver 9597 seed lot (300kg) was firstly graded by 7 round sieves and then 7 rectangle sieves graded each bound. Some factors such as germination , monogermity and proportionate seed pelleting materials due to seed size evaluated of categories seven bounds contained 70% of total weight which had hormal seedling carsteristies. All categories nacked seed lots were coated with 1/1, 1/2 and 1/3 ratio of seed weighty pelleting materials composition, respectively. Germination, monogermity and uniformity and some other factors were determined on pelleted seeds. Results showed that the over using seed pelleting material (1/3) had negative effect on germination and uniformity. This results indicated that tooptaind acceptable germination and uniformity in emergence the proportion of seed pelleting material and seed weight should be 1/1 respectively. The results indicated suitable germination and uniformity in emergence created by 1/1 ratio of seed pelleting material and seed weight.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In order to determination of optimum quantity of seed pelleting materials due to sugar beet monogerm seed size. This study was carried out in seed technology department during 1997-1998. Monogerm cultiver 9597 seed lot (300kg) was firstly graded by 7 round sieves and then 7 rectangle sieves graded each bound. Some factors such as germination , monogermity and proportionate seed pelleting materials due to seed size evaluated of categories seven bounds contained 70% of total weight which had hormal seedling carsteristies. All categories nacked seed lots were coated with 1/1, 1/2 and 1/3 ratio of seed weighty pelleting materials composition, respectively. Germination, monogermity and uniformity and some other factors were determined on pelleted seeds. Results showed that the over using seed pelleting material (1/3) had negative effect on germination and uniformity. This results indicated that tooptaind acceptable germination and uniformity in emergence the proportion of seed pelleting material and seed weight should be 1/1 respectively. The results indicated suitable germination and uniformity in emergence created by 1/1 ratio of seed pelleting material and seed weight.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">germination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Monogerm Seed</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pellete</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pelleting materials</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Uniformity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_8276_5eb15d693b61d43d02e8da6a353e9d0e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2003</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Effect of beet mosaic virus on sugar beet seed yield in greenhouse condition</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Effect of beet mosaic virus on sugar beet seed yield in greenhouse condition</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>109</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>118</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8278</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2003.8278</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jalali</LastName>
<Affiliation>Plant Pests and Diseases Dept., Isfahan Agricultural Research Center</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>GH. H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Masahebi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tehran Univ., College of Agriculture, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Okhovat</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tehran Univ., College of Agriculture, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In order to  study the effect of beet mosaic virus on sugarbeet seed yield, an isolate of beet mosaic virus was collected from sugarbeet fields in Karaj and biologically was purified by inoculation on &lt;em&gt;Chenopodium amaranticolor&lt;/em&gt; and propagated on &lt;em&gt;Beta vulgaris &lt;/em&gt;cv. Cicla under greenhouse conditions. &lt;br /&gt;The infected sap was inoculated on leaves of  sugar beet  7233 variety at  two stages, after and before vernalization using a randomized complete design. with 3 treatments and 4 replication. &lt;br /&gt;The results showed  that infection of plants before vernalization  had a serious losses on seed yield. Seed production was decreased 43% as compared with healthy plants (Checks) and showed significant differences with the control. Also, stem length of the infected plants were 33.2% shorter than healthy plants  as significant  differences  with the control. &lt;br /&gt;Infection of the plants after vernalization  had  no  significant differences with the control and  yield  losses were about 7%.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In order to  study the effect of beet mosaic virus on sugarbeet seed yield, an isolate of beet mosaic virus was collected from sugarbeet fields in Karaj and biologically was purified by inoculation on &lt;em&gt;Chenopodium amaranticolor&lt;/em&gt; and propagated on &lt;em&gt;Beta vulgaris &lt;/em&gt;cv. Cicla under greenhouse conditions. &lt;br /&gt;The infected sap was inoculated on leaves of  sugar beet  7233 variety at  two stages, after and before vernalization using a randomized complete design. with 3 treatments and 4 replication. &lt;br /&gt;The results showed  that infection of plants before vernalization  had a serious losses on seed yield. Seed production was decreased 43% as compared with healthy plants (Checks) and showed significant differences with the control. Also, stem length of the infected plants were 33.2% shorter than healthy plants  as significant  differences  with the control. &lt;br /&gt;Infection of the plants after vernalization  had  no  significant differences with the control and  yield  losses were about 7%.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mosaic Virus</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">seed production</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_8278_d045c27b1f671d1c1512adfa42d08b28.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2003</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Study of autumn  sowing of sugar beet in  the tropical areas  of  kermanshah province</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Study of autumn  sowing of sugar beet in  the tropical areas  of  kermanshah province</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>119</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>130</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8279</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2003.8279</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Basati1</LastName>
<Affiliation>kermanshah agricultural research center , Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kolivand</LastName>
<Affiliation>kermanshah agricultural research center , Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Neamati</LastName>
<Affiliation>kermanshah agricultural research center , Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zareii</LastName>
<Affiliation>kermanshah agricultural research center , Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Sugar  is very important role  in  humanbeing feed.  for sugar Beet  production in tropical area detemine  sowing and  harvesting date is very important . For this reason three sowing date (1 sep, 20 sep and 10 oct) and three harvesting date (15 Apr, 15 may and 15 jun) in complete Blouck design as factorial with three replication in two year in Sarpol area condoucted. Results  showed  that  the first sowing date has highest  bolting and  third  sowing  date  has lowest bolting. Thirs harvest date has highest  level of  bolting. Root yield  in the first sowing date more than the other. Interaction  between two factors showed that 1 Sep sowing date  * 15 May harvesting date  for root yield was very better than the other  interaction  factors .  The best date of sowing  in  this area  was until  20 Sep  and for  date harvest was 15 May . For development of sugar beet caltivated  in this area need to more investigation.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Sugar  is very important role  in  humanbeing feed.  for sugar Beet  production in tropical area detemine  sowing and  harvesting date is very important . For this reason three sowing date (1 sep, 20 sep and 10 oct) and three harvesting date (15 Apr, 15 may and 15 jun) in complete Blouck design as factorial with three replication in two year in Sarpol area condoucted. Results  showed  that  the first sowing date has highest  bolting and  third  sowing  date  has lowest bolting. Thirs harvest date has highest  level of  bolting. Root yield  in the first sowing date more than the other. Interaction  between two factors showed that 1 Sep sowing date  * 15 May harvesting date  for root yield was very better than the other  interaction  factors .  The best date of sowing  in  this area  was until  20 Sep  and for  date harvest was 15 May . For development of sugar beet caltivated  in this area need to more investigation.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">autumn cultivated</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Harvesting date</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Kermanshah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sowing date</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">tropical area</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_8279_1f0cfa0e3fd15d929e1731fa795135d6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2003</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Determination of favorite harvesting date of three sugar beet varieties in Hamedan</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Determination of favorite harvesting date of three sugar beet varieties in Hamedan</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>131</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>142</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8280</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2003.8280</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ebrahimi Koulaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Agriculture Research Center of Hamedan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Short growing season in cold regions is an important factor in not achieving a maximum root yield in sugar beet crop. In an investigation on possible ways to limit the effect of short season culture on the crop, six harvest dates and three sugar beet varieties were considered. The experiment was conducted as a factorial with randomized complete block design in three replications, from 1996-1998 at Ekbatan Research station in Hamedan. Planting dates (The beginning of May) and all cultural practices were kept identical for all treatments. Sugar beet harvest was carried out at selected dates, and data were collected for statistical analysis. Results of ANOVA showed that there were significant differences among sugar beet lines, with BR1 showing the highest: root yield, sugar content and white sugar yield as companed to two other lines. Significant differences were observed for root yield, raw sugar yield, white sugar yield, sugar content, the coefficient of extraction and profit gained in different harvest dates. The two dates of Oct. 12 and Nov. 11, were superior to Sept. 23 and Oct. 2 in all parameters. The highest raw sugar and white sugar content were obtained in Nov. 11 harvest date as compared to others. The highest sugar yield and white sugar yield with 10.09 t/ha and 8.7 t/ha respectively belonged to the harvest of No. 11, which excepted for the No. 1, differed significantly with other harvest dates, coefficient of sugar extraction was increased for the late harvest and the three late harvests, were superior to the early ones regarding average profit obtained in three years and that of the year 2000. Harvest dates of Nov. 11, Nov 1, Nov. 21, Oct 12 and Oct. 2 were respectively 46, 39, 33, 26 and 17% higher as compared to profit of the Sept. 23 harvest date.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Short growing season in cold regions is an important factor in not achieving a maximum root yield in sugar beet crop. In an investigation on possible ways to limit the effect of short season culture on the crop, six harvest dates and three sugar beet varieties were considered. The experiment was conducted as a factorial with randomized complete block design in three replications, from 1996-1998 at Ekbatan Research station in Hamedan. Planting dates (The beginning of May) and all cultural practices were kept identical for all treatments. Sugar beet harvest was carried out at selected dates, and data were collected for statistical analysis. Results of ANOVA showed that there were significant differences among sugar beet lines, with BR1 showing the highest: root yield, sugar content and white sugar yield as companed to two other lines. Significant differences were observed for root yield, raw sugar yield, white sugar yield, sugar content, the coefficient of extraction and profit gained in different harvest dates. The two dates of Oct. 12 and Nov. 11, were superior to Sept. 23 and Oct. 2 in all parameters. The highest raw sugar and white sugar content were obtained in Nov. 11 harvest date as compared to others. The highest sugar yield and white sugar yield with 10.09 t/ha and 8.7 t/ha respectively belonged to the harvest of No. 11, which excepted for the No. 1, differed significantly with other harvest dates, coefficient of sugar extraction was increased for the late harvest and the three late harvests, were superior to the early ones regarding average profit obtained in three years and that of the year 2000. Harvest dates of Nov. 11, Nov 1, Nov. 21, Oct 12 and Oct. 2 were respectively 46, 39, 33, 26 and 17% higher as compared to profit of the Sept. 23 harvest date.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">BR1</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">income</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cold regions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hamedan</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Harvesting date</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_8280_8ff2b8af441524066dd571e59f9aac29.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2003</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Identification of Fusarium species associated  with sugar beet root in Khorasan province and investigation of the pathogenicity of Fusarium  oxysporum</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Identification of Fusarium species associated  with sugar beet root in Khorasan province and investigation of the pathogenicity of Fusarium  oxysporum</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>143</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>154</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8281</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2003.8281</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dastjerdi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Falahati-Rastegar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Plant Pathology, Collage of Agriculture, University of Mashhad- Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>B.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jafarpoor</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Plant Pathology, Collage of Agriculture, University of Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study was carried out to identify &lt;em&gt;Fusarium&lt;/em&gt; species associated with sugar beet root rot and yellows. Pathogenicity of &lt;em&gt;Fusarium oxysporum, &lt;/em&gt;the causal agent of Fusariumyellows of sugar beet was also investigated. Samples of infected roots were collected from fields in major sugar beet producing areas in Khorasan province during 1999-2000. Infected roots were washed, surface sterilised and plated on PDA. One hundred sixty eight isolates of &lt;em&gt;Fusarium &lt;/em&gt;spp. were recovered. Seven species were identified including&lt;em&gt; Fusarium solani &lt;/em&gt;(42 isolates), &lt;em&gt;F. oxysporum &lt;/em&gt;(31 isolates),&lt;em&gt; F. acuminatum &lt;/em&gt;(27 isolates), &lt;em&gt;F.  avenaceum &lt;/em&gt;(23 isolates),&lt;em&gt; F. moniliforme &lt;/em&gt;(19 isolates), &lt;em&gt;F. equiseti&lt;/em&gt; (16 isolates) and &lt;em&gt;F. culmorum &lt;/em&gt;(10 isolates). All isolates of &lt;em&gt;F. oxysporum &lt;/em&gt;were tested for their pathogenicity on seedlings and matured sugar beet plants. The results showed that 12 isolates (38.7%) of&lt;em&gt; F. oxysporum &lt;/em&gt;were non-pathogenic, and 19 isolates (61.3%) were  pathogenic.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study was carried out to identify &lt;em&gt;Fusarium&lt;/em&gt; species associated with sugar beet root rot and yellows. Pathogenicity of &lt;em&gt;Fusarium oxysporum, &lt;/em&gt;the causal agent of Fusariumyellows of sugar beet was also investigated. Samples of infected roots were collected from fields in major sugar beet producing areas in Khorasan province during 1999-2000. Infected roots were washed, surface sterilised and plated on PDA. One hundred sixty eight isolates of &lt;em&gt;Fusarium &lt;/em&gt;spp. were recovered. Seven species were identified including&lt;em&gt; Fusarium solani &lt;/em&gt;(42 isolates), &lt;em&gt;F. oxysporum &lt;/em&gt;(31 isolates),&lt;em&gt; F. acuminatum &lt;/em&gt;(27 isolates), &lt;em&gt;F.  avenaceum &lt;/em&gt;(23 isolates),&lt;em&gt; F. moniliforme &lt;/em&gt;(19 isolates), &lt;em&gt;F. equiseti&lt;/em&gt; (16 isolates) and &lt;em&gt;F. culmorum &lt;/em&gt;(10 isolates). All isolates of &lt;em&gt;F. oxysporum &lt;/em&gt;were tested for their pathogenicity on seedlings and matured sugar beet plants. The results showed that 12 isolates (38.7%) of&lt;em&gt; F. oxysporum &lt;/em&gt;were non-pathogenic, and 19 isolates (61.3%) were  pathogenic.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fusarium species</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Khorasan province</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_8281_1fdac8e166172ea04676836574ddd9e3.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2003</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Histopathological study of resistance to Cercospora beticola in sugar beet</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Histopathological study of resistance to Cercospora beticola in sugar beet</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>167</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>155</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8282</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2003.8282</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abbasi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tarbiat Modarres Univ. College of Agriculture</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alizadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tarbiat Modarres Univ. College of Agriculture</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mesbah</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohammadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tarbiat Modarres Univ. College of Agriculture, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Infection process including spore germination, penetration and intercellular development of &lt;em&gt;Cercospora beticola&lt;/em&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;mesophyl&lt;/em&gt;l of immature and mature leaves of two resistant  (FD0018 and HM1836) and a susceptible genotypes (236) of sugar beet were studied, in order to determine the relative importance of defense phenomena in pre and post-penetration stage of infection to the pathogen in sugar beet. The results indicated that pre-penetration stages had no importance in resistance because there was no significant difference between resistant and susceptible genotypes, but in endophytic phase some penetrating germ tubes in resistant genotype stopped in initial stages and did not develop to necrotic phase.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Infection process including spore germination, penetration and intercellular development of &lt;em&gt;Cercospora beticola&lt;/em&gt; in the &lt;em&gt;mesophyl&lt;/em&gt;l of immature and mature leaves of two resistant  (FD0018 and HM1836) and a susceptible genotypes (236) of sugar beet were studied, in order to determine the relative importance of defense phenomena in pre and post-penetration stage of infection to the pathogen in sugar beet. The results indicated that pre-penetration stages had no importance in resistance because there was no significant difference between resistant and susceptible genotypes, but in endophytic phase some penetrating germ tubes in resistant genotype stopped in initial stages and did not develop to necrotic phase.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cercospora beticola</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Histopathology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">resistance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_8282_3efb7242790c1e77402be407292e7488.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2003</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Short note- New approach to the management of genetically modified herbicide tolerant sugar beet</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Short note- New approach to the management of genetically modified herbicide tolerant sugar beet</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>167</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>168</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8284</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2003.8284</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abdollahian-Noghabi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract></Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_8284_2db8101148e44d87099de1c7847de786.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
