<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Investigation of quantity and quality characters of sugar beet crop under furrow and micro irrigation systems in Hamedan</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Investigation of quantity and quality characters of sugar beet crop under furrow and micro irrigation systems in Hamedan</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>122</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>111</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1313</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2007.1313</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M. R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirzaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of  Agricultural and Natural Resources Research  Center, Hamedan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghadami Firuzabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of  Agricultural and Natural Resources Research  Center, Hamedan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2006</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Water is the most important factor for agriculture development in Iran. Accordingly the optimal consumptione of water is very important. Using pressurized irrigation system is one of the methods to improve agricultural water management. The objecttives of this research were to compare two irrigation methods of furrow and trickle irrigation systems impacts on quantity and quality characters of sugar beet yield. The experimental deign was randomized complete blocks with four treatments and three replications in Hamedan province during 2002 to 2003. The treatments consisted of trickle (tape) irrigation of crop water requirement with three irrigation levels of %50, %75 and %100 and another treatment was furrow irrigation with irrigation level of %100 crop water requirement. Combined analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences between years for sugar content, α– amino nitrogen, alcality, amount of sugar in molasses, root yield, sugar yield and white sugar yield. These characters, therefore varied dute year to year effects. Significant differences among treatments were only observed for K and alkality. However, the interaction of year with treatments was significant for sugar content, α – amino nitrogen, root yield, sugar yield and white sugar yield. The maximum and the minimum water use efficiency was related to trickle irrigation with 50% crop water requirement and furrow irrigation which were 1.19 and 0.6, kg/m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. Mean water consumption in furrow and trickle (Tape) irrigations of %100,%75 and %50 were 14886, 8932, 7309 and 5679 m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;/ha respectively. The water consumption in trickle (Tape) irrigation of %100 decreased about %40 as compared to furrow irrigation But the root yield, sugar yield and white sugar yield of those treatments werenot different significantly. In conclusion, considering acceptable level of root yield and  white sugar yield in sugar beet agronomy and regarding the decrease in water consumption and increase of water use efficiency trickle (Tape) irrigation under %100 and %75 crop water requirement seem to be recommended.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Water is the most important factor for agriculture development in Iran. Accordingly the optimal consumptione of water is very important. Using pressurized irrigation system is one of the methods to improve agricultural water management. The objecttives of this research were to compare two irrigation methods of furrow and trickle irrigation systems impacts on quantity and quality characters of sugar beet yield. The experimental deign was randomized complete blocks with four treatments and three replications in Hamedan province during 2002 to 2003. The treatments consisted of trickle (tape) irrigation of crop water requirement with three irrigation levels of %50, %75 and %100 and another treatment was furrow irrigation with irrigation level of %100 crop water requirement. Combined analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences between years for sugar content, α– amino nitrogen, alcality, amount of sugar in molasses, root yield, sugar yield and white sugar yield. These characters, therefore varied dute year to year effects. Significant differences among treatments were only observed for K and alkality. However, the interaction of year with treatments was significant for sugar content, α – amino nitrogen, root yield, sugar yield and white sugar yield. The maximum and the minimum water use efficiency was related to trickle irrigation with 50% crop water requirement and furrow irrigation which were 1.19 and 0.6, kg/m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. Mean water consumption in furrow and trickle (Tape) irrigations of %100,%75 and %50 were 14886, 8932, 7309 and 5679 m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;/ha respectively. The water consumption in trickle (Tape) irrigation of %100 decreased about %40 as compared to furrow irrigation But the root yield, sugar yield and white sugar yield of those treatments werenot different significantly. In conclusion, considering acceptable level of root yield and  white sugar yield in sugar beet agronomy and regarding the decrease in water consumption and increase of water use efficiency trickle (Tape) irrigation under %100 and %75 crop water requirement seem to be recommended.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Furrow irrigation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hamedan</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Trickle irrigation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Water use efficiency</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1313_5d351b99090ea73a79b32e74d95b8de2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Integrated weed management of sugar beet using planting date and cultivation in Dezful</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Integrated weed management of sugar beet using planting date and cultivation in Dezful</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>134</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>123</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1314</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2007.1314</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M. R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Orazizadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of  Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hosseinpour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of  Safi-Abad Agri. Res. Center-Dezful</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>D.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghanbari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of  Safi-Abad Agri. Res. Center-Dezful</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sharifi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of  Safi-Abad Agri. Res. Center-Dezful</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2006</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In order to evaluate some agronomical management on weed control in sugar beet this experiment was conducted at Safi-Abad Agr.Res.Center, Dezful in 2002 and 2004. Tow planting dates, September 16 and October 12 and five cultivator applications, one and two time application at 4-6 and 6-8 leaf stages, respectively and once plus hand hoeing, weedy and weed free checks arranged in split plot design with four replications. Main plots, sub-plots assigned to planting dates and cultivator, respectively. Weed number was counted after application of cultivator and weed fresh weight and root quality and quantity was measured at harvest on early to mid May. In the first year, planting dates have not significant effects on sugar beet yield and quality, weed number and weed fresh weight. There are significant differences among cultivator treatments for most of sugar beet yield and quality traits, weed number and weed fresh weight. In the second year, the planting date did not also significantly affect the root yield, sugar yield and sugar content, and the cultivator treatments showed significant differences only for root and sugar yields. The combined analysis showed that there were significant differences between years for sugar beet root quality and quantity, weed number and weed fresh weight. Planting date has significant effect on potassium and harmful nitrogen. Root and sugar yield, weed number and weed fresh weight were significantly influenced by cultivator treatments.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In order to evaluate some agronomical management on weed control in sugar beet this experiment was conducted at Safi-Abad Agr.Res.Center, Dezful in 2002 and 2004. Tow planting dates, September 16 and October 12 and five cultivator applications, one and two time application at 4-6 and 6-8 leaf stages, respectively and once plus hand hoeing, weedy and weed free checks arranged in split plot design with four replications. Main plots, sub-plots assigned to planting dates and cultivator, respectively. Weed number was counted after application of cultivator and weed fresh weight and root quality and quantity was measured at harvest on early to mid May. In the first year, planting dates have not significant effects on sugar beet yield and quality, weed number and weed fresh weight. There are significant differences among cultivator treatments for most of sugar beet yield and quality traits, weed number and weed fresh weight. In the second year, the planting date did not also significantly affect the root yield, sugar yield and sugar content, and the cultivator treatments showed significant differences only for root and sugar yields. The combined analysis showed that there were significant differences between years for sugar beet root quality and quantity, weed number and weed fresh weight. Planting date has significant effect on potassium and harmful nitrogen. Root and sugar yield, weed number and weed fresh weight were significantly influenced by cultivator treatments.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cultivator</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Dezful</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">integrated management</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Planting date</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Safi-Abad</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">weed</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1314_44eb6520d67121f08b8cec20ecaf60f6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Characterization of sugar beet Rhizoctonia isolates in Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Characterization of sugar beet Rhizoctonia isolates in Iran</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>150</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>135</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1315</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2007.1315</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soltani Nezhad</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc. College of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University,Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S. B.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahmoodi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of  Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Farrokhi Nezhad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of College of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University,Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>During 2001-2005, 79 isolates of Rhizoctonia from seed rot, seedling damping –off, root rot and dry rot canker of sugar beet were collected. Based on morphological characteristics, number of nuclei per cell and hyphal diameter, isolates were classified in two groups, binucleate (4 isolates) and multinucleate (75 isolates). Among 75 multinucleate isolates ,27 isolates were identified as  AG4, 28 isolates as AG2, two isolates as AG3 and one isolate as AG5.The remaining of the isolates( 17 isolates) did not anastomose with any of tester cultures. Most of isolates of AG2 had been isolated from root rot symptoms, but AG4 isolates from damping –off and root rot symptoms. From dry rot canker symptoms with concentric ring on the root surface of sugar beet, 5 Rhizoctonia isolates were collected, that did not anastomose with any tester cultures. Optimum temperature for mycelial growth ranged from 25 to 30, but for dry rot canker isolates was above 30 °C. Pathogenicity test was carried out in &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; condition. Representative isolates from each AG and each geographic location were selected for pathogenicity test. Results showed that the isolates varied in their virulence.AG4 isolates were highly virulent on seedling and more virulent than AG2 isolates.AG3 and AG5 isolates caused superficial discoloration on seedling. From binucleate isolates, two of them were as pathogenic as dry rot canker isolates. Virulence variation of selected isolates of different anastomosis groups were also investigated on mature sugar beet plants under greenhouse conditions. Results showed that both isolates of anastomosis groups 2 and 4 had the ability to cause root rot, however, the disease severity of anastomosis group 2 (AG-2) on mature plants was higher than those of AG-4 group.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">During 2001-2005, 79 isolates of Rhizoctonia from seed rot, seedling damping –off, root rot and dry rot canker of sugar beet were collected. Based on morphological characteristics, number of nuclei per cell and hyphal diameter, isolates were classified in two groups, binucleate (4 isolates) and multinucleate (75 isolates). Among 75 multinucleate isolates ,27 isolates were identified as  AG4, 28 isolates as AG2, two isolates as AG3 and one isolate as AG5.The remaining of the isolates( 17 isolates) did not anastomose with any of tester cultures. Most of isolates of AG2 had been isolated from root rot symptoms, but AG4 isolates from damping –off and root rot symptoms. From dry rot canker symptoms with concentric ring on the root surface of sugar beet, 5 Rhizoctonia isolates were collected, that did not anastomose with any tester cultures. Optimum temperature for mycelial growth ranged from 25 to 30, but for dry rot canker isolates was above 30 °C. Pathogenicity test was carried out in &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; condition. Representative isolates from each AG and each geographic location were selected for pathogenicity test. Results showed that the isolates varied in their virulence.AG4 isolates were highly virulent on seedling and more virulent than AG2 isolates.AG3 and AG5 isolates caused superficial discoloration on seedling. From binucleate isolates, two of them were as pathogenic as dry rot canker isolates. Virulence variation of selected isolates of different anastomosis groups were also investigated on mature sugar beet plants under greenhouse conditions. Results showed that both isolates of anastomosis groups 2 and 4 had the ability to cause root rot, however, the disease severity of anastomosis group 2 (AG-2) on mature plants was higher than those of AG-4 group.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Anastomosis groups</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Damping –off</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Dry rot canker</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iran</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pathogenicity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rhizoctonia</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1315_073194da7487a42276d7763ffb5e7066.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluation of general and specific combining ability of sugar beet diploid pollinators</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluation of general and specific combining ability of sugar beet diploid pollinators</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>162</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>151</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1316</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2007.1316</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M. R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fathi</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc. of  Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mesbah</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Seed and Plant Certification Institute - Karaj- Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Z.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ranji</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of  Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Karaj, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vazan</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Islamic Azad  University Karaj Branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Farrokhi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of  Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Oilseed Crops  Department, Karaj, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2006</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>General combining ability of sugar beet parents were determined for different quantity and quality characteristics.Forty six sugar beet hybrids obtained from crosses of 23 diploid pollinators with two male sterile parents as tester together with three checks were evaluated for 10 important agronomic and technological characters at Kamalshar Research Station in Karaj in 2004.Experiment was carried out as a 7*7 lattice design with four replications. There were significant differences between treatments for root yield, sugar content, nitrogen, sodium, potassium, white sugar yield, extractable sugar, sugar yield, purity and molassed sugar at 1% probability level.The check varieties were excluded before the analysis of data for combining abilities. General combining ability of lines was significantly different for sugar content and extractable sugar at 1% and for root yield, sugar yield, white sugar yield, sodium, purity, and molassed sugar at 10% probability level and for potassium at 5% probability level. As the general combining ability was significant for the above traits it could be concluded that they are controlled by additive gene effects.In addition, specific combining ability of lines was significantly different for sugar content, extractable sugar and potassium at 1% and for nitrogen at 5% probability levels.Therefor, non-additive effects of genes are involved in the control of  these traits. </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">General combining ability of sugar beet parents were determined for different quantity and quality characteristics.Forty six sugar beet hybrids obtained from crosses of 23 diploid pollinators with two male sterile parents as tester together with three checks were evaluated for 10 important agronomic and technological characters at Kamalshar Research Station in Karaj in 2004.Experiment was carried out as a 7*7 lattice design with four replications. There were significant differences between treatments for root yield, sugar content, nitrogen, sodium, potassium, white sugar yield, extractable sugar, sugar yield, purity and molassed sugar at 1% probability level.The check varieties were excluded before the analysis of data for combining abilities. General combining ability of lines was significantly different for sugar content and extractable sugar at 1% and for root yield, sugar yield, white sugar yield, sodium, purity, and molassed sugar at 10% probability level and for potassium at 5% probability level. As the general combining ability was significant for the above traits it could be concluded that they are controlled by additive gene effects.In addition, specific combining ability of lines was significantly different for sugar content, extractable sugar and potassium at 1% and for nitrogen at 5% probability levels.Therefor, non-additive effects of genes are involved in the control of  these traits. </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">diploid</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">General combining ability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Male sterile</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Line ×tester</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pollinator</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Specific combining ability</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1316_1aff8c41a4ff874fe391476b81c7c43d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Determining the distribution of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus and its vector in Marvdasht area by serological and PCR methods</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Determining the distribution of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus and its vector in Marvdasht area by serological and PCR methods</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>175</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>163</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1317</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2007.1317</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S. M. R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Moosavi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of  Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>During the summer of 2004, a survey was conducted to determine the incidence and distribution of &lt;em&gt;Beet necrotic yellow vein virus&lt;/em&gt; (BNYVV) and its vector (&lt;em&gt;Polymyxa betae &lt;/em&gt;Keskin) in Marvdasht, Fars province of Iran.  A total of 353 root samples were collected randomly as well as 124 samples from plants showing rhizomania- associated symptoms.  The presence of BNYVV in the samples were tested by triple-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TAS-ELISA) using the specific antisera against BNYVV (Adgen diagnostic, UK). BNYVV was serologically detected in 48.2% and 81.0% of randomly and symptomatically collected samples, respectively.  Root beard extracts that were positive for BNYVV in ELISA tests were mechanically inoculated on indicator host plants, which resulted in chlorotic followed by necrotic lesions in&lt;em&gt; Chenopodium quinoa&lt;/em&gt; and local necrotic lesion in &lt;em&gt;C. amaranticolor&lt;/em&gt;.Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using specific primers for BNYVV RNA 1 to 4 confirmed the presence of BNYVV in the samples. As BNYVV is transmitted by &lt;em&gt;P. betae&lt;/em&gt; and preserved a long time in resting spores of this fungus, distribution of this fungus was also determined.  The samples were tested by PCR for evaluation of the presence of &lt;em&gt;P. betae &lt;/em&gt;using the specific primers and the vector was found in 94% of the fields surveyed.  Finally RNA 4 of BNYVV was partially sequenced and compared with other submitted sequences in GeneBank and showed 99.3% and 99.6% similarity with Japanese and Italian isolates, respectively.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">During the summer of 2004, a survey was conducted to determine the incidence and distribution of &lt;em&gt;Beet necrotic yellow vein virus&lt;/em&gt; (BNYVV) and its vector (&lt;em&gt;Polymyxa betae &lt;/em&gt;Keskin) in Marvdasht, Fars province of Iran.  A total of 353 root samples were collected randomly as well as 124 samples from plants showing rhizomania- associated symptoms.  The presence of BNYVV in the samples were tested by triple-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TAS-ELISA) using the specific antisera against BNYVV (Adgen diagnostic, UK). BNYVV was serologically detected in 48.2% and 81.0% of randomly and symptomatically collected samples, respectively.  Root beard extracts that were positive for BNYVV in ELISA tests were mechanically inoculated on indicator host plants, which resulted in chlorotic followed by necrotic lesions in&lt;em&gt; Chenopodium quinoa&lt;/em&gt; and local necrotic lesion in &lt;em&gt;C. amaranticolor&lt;/em&gt;.Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using specific primers for BNYVV RNA 1 to 4 confirmed the presence of BNYVV in the samples. As BNYVV is transmitted by &lt;em&gt;P. betae&lt;/em&gt; and preserved a long time in resting spores of this fungus, distribution of this fungus was also determined.  The samples were tested by PCR for evaluation of the presence of &lt;em&gt;P. betae &lt;/em&gt;using the specific primers and the vector was found in 94% of the fields surveyed.  Finally RNA 4 of BNYVV was partially sequenced and compared with other submitted sequences in GeneBank and showed 99.3% and 99.6% similarity with Japanese and Italian isolates, respectively.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Polymyxa betae</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">TAS-ELISA</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">PCR</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sequencing</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1317_14b871f99d6da5341c8c37e3fbef8bb7.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Measurement of sugar beet water requirements by lysimeter method in Mashhsd</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Measurement of sugar beet water requirements by lysimeter method in Mashhsd</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>184</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>177</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1318</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2007.1318</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahabifar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of  Soil and Water Institute-  Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M. H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahimian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of  Agricultural and Natural Resources Research  Center, Khorasan Rzavi</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2005</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>For determining sugar beet water requirements, this work was conducted at the  Agricultural Research Station of Torog in Mashhad for 3 years. Crop water requirement was measured by a drainage type lysimeter with dimension of 2*2*1 m. In order to reduce side effects, an area about 1600 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; around the lysimeter (as a guard) was cultivated with sugar beet. Soil water content was measured by tensiometer. Results showed that sugar beet water requirement were 1188, 1348 and 1092 mm during the three growing seasons (1997-1999) with the mean of 1221 mm. Rain were 96, 138.3 and 61.2 mm during the three growing seasons. The mean of root and gross sugar yield were 56.5 and 10.05 t/ha, respectively. The values of water use efficiencies regarding root and sugar yield were 4.63 and 0.82 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. Based on results, the value of hydromodol was 1.14 l/s/ha and this value is necessary for irrigation system design and irrigation projects.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">For determining sugar beet water requirements, this work was conducted at the  Agricultural Research Station of Torog in Mashhad for 3 years. Crop water requirement was measured by a drainage type lysimeter with dimension of 2*2*1 m. In order to reduce side effects, an area about 1600 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; around the lysimeter (as a guard) was cultivated with sugar beet. Soil water content was measured by tensiometer. Results showed that sugar beet water requirement were 1188, 1348 and 1092 mm during the three growing seasons (1997-1999) with the mean of 1221 mm. Rain were 96, 138.3 and 61.2 mm during the three growing seasons. The mean of root and gross sugar yield were 56.5 and 10.05 t/ha, respectively. The values of water use efficiencies regarding root and sugar yield were 4.63 and 0.82 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. Based on results, the value of hydromodol was 1.14 l/s/ha and this value is necessary for irrigation system design and irrigation projects.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Evapotranspiration</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Lysimeter</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mashhad</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Water requirement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">yield</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1318_95f0de3237bed3eccd241691c16a2123.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Studying productivity of and demand for water in sugar beet production in Eqlid district</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Studying productivity of and demand for water in sugar beet production in Eqlid district</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>186</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>185</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1319</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>F.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bostani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Islamic azad University of Marv Dasht branch, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohammadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Islamic azad University of Jahrom branch,Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2006</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this paper, productivity of and demand for water throughout Eqlid’s Sugar beet growers in 1385 were investigated. To address the objective 100 growers were selected using two-stage cluster sampling, then required dataset was obtained by interviewing and completing questionnaire. In order to study factors affecting Sugar beet production, Cobb-Douglas production function was applied. Based on the findings, water, poison, machinery, cropping area and credits were revealed to affect production significantly, with positive effect of water and machinery. Average and marginal productivity of water were 0.89 and 0.304, respectively. According to R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; coefficient, it was recognized that estimated production function can explain 85% of production changes. The results also showed demand elasticity of more than unit for water, indicating elastic demand relative to input price. So, using appropriate price policy can depart toward preventing irregular use of water and leading growers toward its optimal use. </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In this paper, productivity of and demand for water throughout Eqlid’s Sugar beet growers in 1385 were investigated. To address the objective 100 growers were selected using two-stage cluster sampling, then required dataset was obtained by interviewing and completing questionnaire. In order to study factors affecting Sugar beet production, Cobb-Douglas production function was applied. Based on the findings, water, poison, machinery, cropping area and credits were revealed to affect production significantly, with positive effect of water and machinery. Average and marginal productivity of water were 0.89 and 0.304, respectively. According to R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; coefficient, it was recognized that estimated production function can explain 85% of production changes. The results also showed demand elasticity of more than unit for water, indicating elastic demand relative to input price. So, using appropriate price policy can depart toward preventing irregular use of water and leading growers toward its optimal use. </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">demand</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fars province</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Eqlid</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Input</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Productivity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Production Function</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sugar beet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Water</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1319_5b6caf6e4fdcb00a2f6b564dbac23dd8.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Sugar Beet Seed Institute in cooperation with the Crop Science Society of Iran  (CSSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Sugar Beet</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-0670</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A review on growth and production of sugar beet crops in Iran during the recent years</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A review on growth and production of sugar beet crops in Iran during the recent years</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>198</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>197</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1660</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22092/jsb.2007.1660</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abdollahian – Noghabi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) -  Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In 2006 the sugar beet crop production inIranwas largest ever.  In this year, 6,603,383 t with average sugar content of 16.84% delivered to the 32 sugar factories during five months of the campaign. From begining of the campaign until early–November there was balance between the amount of sugar beet delivered and that of processed by the sugar factories.  However, delivered beet to the factories exceeded than that processed by the factories during late–November and early–December, mostly due to risk of being frozen. Therefore, storage beets in the factories were 1,500,000 t for ten days in early–December.  The amount of delivered beet in 2006 was 35% larger than that in 2005 (4,896,835 t), but the average sugar content was 1.5% less.  The highest sugar content was recorded in theFarsprovince.  During the campaign of 2006, beet juice purity showed reduction pattern.  In addition, due to limitation in the capacity of some sugar factories, amount of 1,118,500 t sugar beets were transported on average 422 km from one province to another.  For this transportation, about 100,000 trucks were used to travel on average 400 km and approximately 17,000,000 litters fuel were consumed.  In general, it is necessary to manage the harvesting sugar beet and their delivery to the factory, to minimize sugar beet losses during the campaign. &lt;br /&gt;Sugar beet crop in 2007 was reduced significantly in comparison to the 2006 campaign.  The sugar beet growers were decreased by 24% from 86,948 in 2006 to 64,109 in 2007.  In addition, the contract area for growing sugar beet in 2007 reduced by 32% from 213,226 ha to 150,663 hain 2006; and the growing area of national beet crop in 2007 reduced by 29% from 179,209 ha to 139,954 ha in 2006.  The growing area of monogerm varieties reached to the largest record of 130,000 ha (approximately 72% of total area), showing development of growing mechanized sugar beet inIran.  Although, total area of sugar beet reduced in 2007, but the proportion of growing monogerm sugar beet was around 74% of total beet cultivated area.  &lt;br /&gt;Harvest and delivery of sugar beet in the campaign of 2007 started from early-October with two weeks delay compared to the previous year.  Total sugar beet production in 2007 was 4,245,161 t and in comparison to the 2006 campaign (6,603,383 t) reduced by 36% equal to 2.4 million tons.  Average sugar content in 2007 was the largest ever, reached to 18.35% and comparing to previous year increased by 1.51 units. The reasons of increasing sugar content in 2007 was probably cool weather during the summer and constantly reduction of the national incidence of Rhizomania diseases and also less rainfall during the harvest period and consequently more root dehydration. More increase in the average of sugar content and relatively less increase in the average of raw juice purity in the campaign of 2007 may confirm this reason. &lt;br /&gt;Total national needs of importing sugar inIranis annually between 500 to 600 thousands tons.  Unfortunately, in 2006 around 2.5 million tons sugar imported from abroad by decision of omitting the customs tariff of sugar import.  As a consequence of importing large amount of sugar, national sugar markets were affected badly.  Therefore, tendency of farmers to sign contracts with sugar factories for growing sugar beet in the next year decreased dramatically.  Thus, production of national sugar beet was reduced in 2007, and the proportion of sugar beet within the arable crops maybe affected in the cultivation area. &lt;br /&gt;In conclusion, to rescue the oldest sugar industry ofIranit is necessary to establish a powerful institution with organized and clear policy to manage and apply the following programs: &lt;br /&gt;1. Production of high quality sugar beet and sugar cone as a raw material for sugar industries. &lt;br /&gt;2. Increasing the efficiency of extracting sugar from beet and cane with minimum price. &lt;br /&gt;3. Logical management of sugar imports and exports in order to control the national sugar market.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In 2006 the sugar beet crop production inIranwas largest ever.  In this year, 6,603,383 t with average sugar content of 16.84% delivered to the 32 sugar factories during five months of the campaign. From begining of the campaign until early–November there was balance between the amount of sugar beet delivered and that of processed by the sugar factories.  However, delivered beet to the factories exceeded than that processed by the factories during late–November and early–December, mostly due to risk of being frozen. Therefore, storage beets in the factories were 1,500,000 t for ten days in early–December.  The amount of delivered beet in 2006 was 35% larger than that in 2005 (4,896,835 t), but the average sugar content was 1.5% less.  The highest sugar content was recorded in theFarsprovince.  During the campaign of 2006, beet juice purity showed reduction pattern.  In addition, due to limitation in the capacity of some sugar factories, amount of 1,118,500 t sugar beets were transported on average 422 km from one province to another.  For this transportation, about 100,000 trucks were used to travel on average 400 km and approximately 17,000,000 litters fuel were consumed.  In general, it is necessary to manage the harvesting sugar beet and their delivery to the factory, to minimize sugar beet losses during the campaign. &lt;br /&gt;Sugar beet crop in 2007 was reduced significantly in comparison to the 2006 campaign.  The sugar beet growers were decreased by 24% from 86,948 in 2006 to 64,109 in 2007.  In addition, the contract area for growing sugar beet in 2007 reduced by 32% from 213,226 ha to 150,663 hain 2006; and the growing area of national beet crop in 2007 reduced by 29% from 179,209 ha to 139,954 ha in 2006.  The growing area of monogerm varieties reached to the largest record of 130,000 ha (approximately 72% of total area), showing development of growing mechanized sugar beet inIran.  Although, total area of sugar beet reduced in 2007, but the proportion of growing monogerm sugar beet was around 74% of total beet cultivated area.  &lt;br /&gt;Harvest and delivery of sugar beet in the campaign of 2007 started from early-October with two weeks delay compared to the previous year.  Total sugar beet production in 2007 was 4,245,161 t and in comparison to the 2006 campaign (6,603,383 t) reduced by 36% equal to 2.4 million tons.  Average sugar content in 2007 was the largest ever, reached to 18.35% and comparing to previous year increased by 1.51 units. The reasons of increasing sugar content in 2007 was probably cool weather during the summer and constantly reduction of the national incidence of Rhizomania diseases and also less rainfall during the harvest period and consequently more root dehydration. More increase in the average of sugar content and relatively less increase in the average of raw juice purity in the campaign of 2007 may confirm this reason. &lt;br /&gt;Total national needs of importing sugar inIranis annually between 500 to 600 thousands tons.  Unfortunately, in 2006 around 2.5 million tons sugar imported from abroad by decision of omitting the customs tariff of sugar import.  As a consequence of importing large amount of sugar, national sugar markets were affected badly.  Therefore, tendency of farmers to sign contracts with sugar factories for growing sugar beet in the next year decreased dramatically.  Thus, production of national sugar beet was reduced in 2007, and the proportion of sugar beet within the arable crops maybe affected in the cultivation area. &lt;br /&gt;In conclusion, to rescue the oldest sugar industry ofIranit is necessary to establish a powerful institution with organized and clear policy to manage and apply the following programs: &lt;br /&gt;1. Production of high quality sugar beet and sugar cone as a raw material for sugar industries. &lt;br /&gt;2. Increasing the efficiency of extracting sugar from beet and cane with minimum price. &lt;br /&gt;3. Logical management of sugar imports and exports in order to control the national sugar market.</OtherAbstract>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_1660_702a3538345ad8549487b1a02ab531e2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
