بررسی راندمان مصرف انرژی و تحلیل اقتصادی مزارع تولید چغندرقند در شهرستان میاندوآب، استان آذربایجان‌غربی

نوع مقاله : کامل علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی دانشگاه شهرکرد

2 استادیار دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهرکرد

3 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه شهرکرد

چکیده

در این مطالعه، تولید چغندرقند در شهرستان میاندوآب استان آذربایجان­غربی از دیدگاه راندمان مصرف انرژی و اقتصادی در سال زراعی 91-1390 مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. مزارع منطقه از نظر مساحت در سه گروه: با مساحت کمتر از یک هکتار، با مساحت بین یک تا دو هکتار و با مساحت بیشتر از دو هکتار دسته­بندی شدند. اطلاعات مربوط به میزان نهاده­ها و ستاده­ها از طریق پرسش­نامه و مصاحبه با کشاورزان جمع­آوری گردیدند. نتایج نشان داد که جمع کل انرژی مصرفی در تولید محصول چغندرقند در گروه­های بهره­برداری اول، دوم و سوم به ترتیب 40700، 46868 و 48646 و مجموع کل ستاده انرژی در سه گروه مزرعه­ای فوق به ترتیب معادل 565488، 857657 و 1081920 مگا­ژول در هکتار بود. راندمان مصرف انرژی در سه گروه مزرعه­ای به ترتیب 89/13، 30/18 و 24/22 درصد به دست آمد. هزینه کل تولید برای گروه­های سه گانه مزرعه­ای به ترتیب 40570، 42315 و 47996 هزار ریال در هکتار و شاخص نسبت فایده به هزینه برای گروه­های بهره­برداری فوق، به ترتیب 02/1، 42/1 و 56/1 بدست آمد. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد مزارع بزرگتر دارای راندمان مصرف انرژی و عملکرد اقتصادی بالاتری بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of sugar beet fields in Miandoab city, West Azerbaijan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • J. Gholami ghajelou 1
  • D. Ghanbarian 2
  • A. Maleki 2
  • M. Torki Harchegani 3
1 Student of Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Shahrekord University, Iran
2 Assistant professor of Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Shahrekord University,Iran
3 Student of Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Shahrekord University, Iran
چکیده [English]

The objectives of this study were to determine the energy use efficiency and economical potential of sugar beet production in Miandoab city, West Azerbaijan province in 2011-12. Fields were classified into three groups as group I (less than 1 ha), group II (1-2 ha), and group III (more than 2 ha). Inputs and outputs data were collected from growers using questionnaire and interview methods. Results showed that the total energy input for the groups I, II and III was 40700, 46868, and 48646 MJ ha-1, respectively and the total energy output was 565488, 857657, and 1081920 MJ ha-1, respectively. Energy use efficiency for the groups I, II and III was 13.89, 18.30 and 22.24%, respectively. The total cost of sugar beet production for the groups I, II and III was 40570, 42315 and 47996 thousands Rials ha-1, respectively. The benefit-to-cost ratio for the groups I, II and III was 1.02, 1.42 and 1.56, respectively. Results of this study showed that larger farms had better energy use efficiency and economic performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Benefit-to-cost ratio
  • Energy use efficiency
  • sugar beet
Asgharipour MR, Mondani F, Riahinia S. Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of sugar beet production system in Iran: A case study in Khorasan Razavi province. Energy. 2012; 44: 1078-1084.(in Persian)
Beheshti Tabar I, Keyhani A, Raiee S. Energy balance in Iran’s agronomy (1990-2006). Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2010; 14: 849-855.(in Persian)
Erdal G, Esengün K, Erdal H, Gündüz O. Energy use and economic analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy. 2007; 32: 35-41.
Ghasemi Mobtaker H, Keyhani A, Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Akram A. Sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for barley production in Hamedan Province of Iran. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2010; 137: 367-372.(in Persian)
Haciseferogullari H, Acaroglu M, Gezer M. Determination of the energy balance of sugar beet plant. Energ Sourc. 2003; 25: 15-22.
Hatirli SA, Ozkan B, Fert K. An econometric analysis of energy input-output in Turkish agriculture. Renew sust Energ Rev. 2005; 9: 608-623.
Iranian Ministry of Agriculture. Statistical Yearbook. Tehran. 2011.(in Persian)
Kitani O. CIGR Handbook of agricultural engineering. Energy and biomass engineering. St Joseph, MI: ASAE publication. 1999.
Külekçi M, Aksoy A. Inpout-Output energy analysis in pistachio production of turkey. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2013; 32: 128-133.
Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A. Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energ Convers Manage. 2008; 49: 3566-3570.
Mohammadi A, Omid M. Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Appl Energ. 2010; 87(1): 191-196.
Mousavi-Avval SH, Rafiee S, Jafari A, Mohammadi A. Optimization of energy consumption for soybean production using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. Appl Energ. 2011; 88: 3765-3772.
Ozkan B, Kurklu A, Akcaoz H. An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: a case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass Bioenerg. 2004; 26: 189-195.
Mohammad shirazi A, Akram A, Rafiee S, Mousavi Avval SH, Bagheri Kalhor E. An analysis of energy use and relation between energy inputs and yield in tangerine production. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2012; 16: 4515-4521.
Pishgar Komleh SH, Sefeedpari P, Rafiee S. Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan province of Iran. Energy. 2011; 36: 5824-5831. (in Persian)
Rafiee S, Mousavi Avval SH, Mohammadi A. Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy. 2010; 35: 3301-3306.
Rajabi Hamedani S, Shabani Z, Rafiee S. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy. 2011; 36: 2367-2371.(in Persian)
Ramedani Z, Rafiee S, Heidari MD. An investigation on energy consumption and sensitivity analysis of soybean production farms. Energy. 2011; 36: 6340-6344.(in Persian)
Tabatabie SMH, Rafiee S, Keyhani A. Energy consumption flow and econometric models of two plum cultivars productions in Tehran province of Iran. Energy. 2012; 44: 211-216.(in Persian)
Tabatabie SMH, Rafiee S, Keyhani A, Heidari MD. Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran. Renew Energ. 2013; 51: 7-12.(in Persian)
Topak R, Süheri S, Acer B. Comparison of energy of irrigation regimes in sugar beet production in a semi-arid region. Energy. 2010; 35: 5464-5471.
Tsatsarelis CA. Energy inputs and outputs for soft winter wheat production in Greece. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 1993; 43:109-118.
Yamane T. Elementary sampling theory. 1967. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, USA.pp; 405.
Yilmaz I, Akcaoz H, Ozkan B. An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renew Energ. 2005; 30: 145-155.
Zanganeh M, Omid M, Akram A. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy. 2010; 35: 2927-2933.